13.12.2012 Views

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

211<br />

than bread and butter. I think it extraordinary that a country can be divided and<br />

people get their heads split open over a visit of a rugby team from a country<br />

thousands of miles away. That wouldn’t happen in many other countries but<br />

shows that New Zealand is now a country whose values are not purely<br />

concerned with shelter and produce. This sort of a society is more open to new<br />

ways of seeing. 697<br />

Ward is referring here to the protests around the Springbok tour of 1981 - protests<br />

which, incidentally had strong support from the New Zealand film industry, as<br />

evidenced by films such as Merata Mita’s Patu! (1983). Ward’s discussions of New<br />

Zealand identity thus stress its complex and changing character, and he is obviously<br />

concerned to probe beyond social surfaces. His themes - the story of a girl coming to<br />

terms with physical changes, with the sudden death of her father and with the arrival of<br />

a stranger who creates family tensions - are the stuff of many myths and fairytales, and<br />

we might describe his basic approach as seeking the archetypal within (or beyond) the<br />

local.<br />

The fact that the film can be read as easily from an international as from a traditional<br />

“New Zealand” perspective perhaps accounts for its critical (if not commercial) success<br />

overseas, particularly in Europe. It was the second New Zealand film (after Sam<br />

Pillsbury’s The Scarecrow, 1982) to be invited to the Directors’ Fortnight at the Cannes<br />

Film Festival and the first New Zealand film to be selected for competition at Cannes.<br />

The founding director of the Directors’ Fortnight, Pierre-Henri Deleau, on his visit to<br />

New Zealand, described the film as “a masterpiece”, but the opinions of the critics at<br />

Cannes were divided. 698 The film was subsequently shown in a number of other<br />

European countries as well as in Australia and the US. A review in Variety commented:<br />

“Ward’s landscape is archetypal New Zealand, but universal as well […]. The<br />

remarkable quality of the film is the way it gives fresh resonance to universal<br />

themes”. 699 The Pressbook of Vigil, put out by the New Zealand Film Commission,<br />

contains a number of selected reviews published shortly after the film’s overseas release<br />

which demonstrate the ability of the film to be read either as a “New Zealand film” or as<br />

a generic art-house (or auteur’s film). David Robinson, of The Times, London,<br />

697<br />

Ward quoted in Lewis, "Kiwi Fruit Springs from a Hard Terrain."<br />

698<br />

"New Zealand Director Gains Cannes Recognition," Evening Post 13 February 1984.<br />

699<br />

"Vigil," Variety 2 May 1984.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!