06.03.2018 Views

Seadet-i Ebediyye - Endless Bliss Third Fascicle

Translations of letters from Imam-i Rabbani's Maktubat. Subjects include importance of having a correct belief and many issues related to namaz, sunnat, tawba, halal, haram, bid'at and tasawwuf.

Translations of letters from Imam-i Rabbani's Maktubat. Subjects include importance of having a correct belief and many issues related to namaz, sunnat, tawba, halal, haram, bid'at and tasawwuf.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that Hadrat Mu’âwiyya began cursing Hadrat Alî, Hadrat Hasan,<br />

Hadrat Hussain and others ‘radiy-Allâhu ’anhum ajma’în’ means<br />

to slander Hadrat Mu’âwiyya. They never pronounced<br />

maledictions against one another. The Madhhab of the Ahl assunnat<br />

wa-l-jamâ’at states that it is not permissible to speak ill of<br />

Hadrat Mu’âwiyya ‘radiy-Allâhu ’anh’ and that that allegation is a<br />

slander against him. In addition, there is not a single genuine<br />

report substantiating it. If historians say so, how can their words<br />

ever be a witness? Basic religious information cannot be<br />

established on the words of historians. Here, the words of Imâm-i<br />

a’zam Abû Hanîfa and his companions are taken into<br />

consideration, not the words of historians or the information<br />

written in the book of Tafsîr entitled of Kashshâf. The names of<br />

Hadrat ’Alî and Hadrat Mu’âwiyya are not mentioned in<br />

Kashshâf. There is not even a sign showing that those two religious<br />

superiors cursed each other. Nevertheless, the so-called statements<br />

written in Kashshâf are true. There is no need to try to deduce<br />

good meanings from them, since there is nothing disagreeing with<br />

the Ahl as-sunnat in them? Yes, the Amawî (Umayyad) Khalîfas<br />

overlooked the Ahl-i bayt’s being cursed for years on minbars.<br />

’Umar bin ’Abdul’aziz ‘rahmatullâhi ’alaih’ put an end to it. May<br />

Allâhu ta’âlâ reward him plentifully through our prayers! But,<br />

although Hadrat Mu’âwiyya ‘radiy-Allâhu ’anh’ was one of the<br />

Khalîfas of the Umayyads, he cannot be spoken ill of. If Hadrat<br />

Mu’âwiyya ‘radiy-Allâhu ’anh’ is cursed and slandered, a great<br />

number of the Sahâba, and even a few of the ’Ashara-i<br />

mubashshara, who were with him in those disagreements and<br />

combats, will have been cursed. And slandering those religious<br />

superiors will obliterate the Islamic teachings coming to us<br />

through them. No Muslim will tolerate or admit that.<br />

Some people slander the three Khalîfas and Hadrat Mu’âwiyya<br />

and those who agreed with him in ijtihâd ‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ<br />

’anhum ajma’în’. They swear at them. They say that after our<br />

Master, the Prophet ‘sall-Allâhu ’alaihi wa sallam’, all the Sahâba<br />

with a few exceptions became renegades. According to the<br />

Madhhab of the Ahl as-sunnat wa-l-jamâ’at, the Sahâba, all of<br />

them, can be talked about in no wise but by uttering good and<br />

respectful terms about them. None of them is bad or evil. While<br />

explaining the hadîths of Muslim, Imâm-i Yahyâ bin Sharaf<br />

Nawawî says that in those combats the Sahâba parted into three<br />

groups. One group had ijtihâd agreeing with that of Hadrat ’Alî<br />

‘radiy-Allâhu ’anh’. It was therefore wâjib for them to choose the<br />

– 117 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!