06.03.2018 Views

Seadet-i Ebediyye - Endless Bliss Third Fascicle

Translations of letters from Imam-i Rabbani's Maktubat. Subjects include importance of having a correct belief and many issues related to namaz, sunnat, tawba, halal, haram, bid'at and tasawwuf.

Translations of letters from Imam-i Rabbani's Maktubat. Subjects include importance of having a correct belief and many issues related to namaz, sunnat, tawba, halal, haram, bid'at and tasawwuf.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

54 — THIRD VOLUME, 39th LETTER<br />

This letter, written to Mawlânâ Muhammad Sâdiq Keshmirî,<br />

explains the difference between the ’ilm-ul-yaqîn of the men of<br />

Tasawwuf and the ’ilm-ul-yaqîn of philosophers:<br />

Hamd be to Allâhu ta’âlâ! Salâm to those slaves of His chosen<br />

and loved by Him! According to men of Tasawwuf, ’ilm-ul-yaqîn<br />

means to infer the agent of the work by seeing the work. Also<br />

philosophers, who follow the way of understanding and judging<br />

everything under the guidance of mind, are of the same opinion.<br />

What is the difference between these two? Why does the ’ilm-ulyaqîn<br />

of men of Tasawwuf become formed through kashf and<br />

shuhûd? In what way is the ’ilm-ul-yaqîn of those religious savants<br />

religious who are not men of Tasawwuf like that of philosophers?<br />

We shall explain these briefly. In both types of ’ilm-ul-yaqîn it is<br />

necessary to see the work. A path through the work will lead to the<br />

unseen doer. The path that leads man to the doer from the work is<br />

the relation between these two. In the ’ilm-ul-yaqîn of the men of<br />

Tasawwuf, this relation is seen through kashf and shuhûd, too. But<br />

in the ’ilm-ul-yaqîn of religious savants and of philosophers this<br />

relation is realized through mind, by thinking and observing. For<br />

this reason, men of Tasawwuf’s recognizing the doer from the<br />

work is hadsî (inductive, intuitive). That is, it happens<br />

automatically and spontaneously. In fact, it is bedîhî, that is, it is<br />

obvious, quite clear. But the others’ inferring the doer by seeing<br />

the work is by thinking, observing. As is seen, the ’ilm-ul-yaqîn of<br />

men of Tasawwuf is through kashf and shuhûd. But the others’<br />

ilm-ul-yaqîn cannot be formed without observing with mind. The<br />

’ilm-ul-yaqîn of men of Tasawwuf also is called istidlâl, that is,<br />

thinking, yet it is called so because inferring the doer from the<br />

work is given this name. In actual fact, it is not istidlâl, but it is<br />

kashf and shuhûd. The ’ilm-ul-yaqîn of religious savants is through<br />

istidlâl. Many people could not understand this subtle difference.<br />

Some of them spoke ill of great men of Tasawwuf. Allâhu ta’âlâ,<br />

alone, communicates the truth of every matter. May our salâm be<br />

upon those who are on the right way!<br />

– 267 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!