25.01.2020 Views

The Case For Christ

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

it fits well with the Gnostic mind-set.<br />

However, the Jesus Seminar has arbitrarily latched onto certain<br />

passages of the Gospel of Thomas and has argued that these<br />

passages represent an early strand of tradition about Jesus, even<br />

earlier than the canonical gospels.<br />

Because none of these passages include Jesus making exalted<br />

claims for himself or doing supernatural feats, they argue that<br />

the earliest view of Jesus was that he was only a great teacher.<br />

But the whole line of reasoning is circular. <strong>The</strong> only reason for<br />

thinking these passages in Thomas are early in the first place<br />

is because they contain a view of Jesus that these scholars<br />

already believed was the original Jesus. In truth there is no<br />

good reason for preferring the second-century Gospel of Thomas<br />

over the first-century gospels of the New Testament."<br />

HISTORY VERSUS FAITH<br />

<strong>The</strong> Jesus of history and the Jesus of faith: the Jesus Seminar<br />

believes there's a big gulf between the two. In its view the<br />

historical Jesus was a bright, witty, countercultural man who<br />

never claimed to be the Son of God, while the Jesus of faith is a<br />

cluster of feel-good ideas that help people live right but are<br />

ultimately based on wishful thinking. "<strong>The</strong>re's not just a gulf<br />

between the Jesus of history and the Jesus of faith," Boyd said<br />

as I brought up this subject. "If you discredit everything that<br />

says Jesus is divine and reconciles people with God, there's an<br />

outright contradiction between the two.<br />

Generally speaking, they define the Jesus of faith this way:<br />

there are religious symbols that are quite meaningful to peoplethe<br />

symbol of Jesus being divine, of the cross, of selfsacrificial<br />

love, of the Resurrection. Even though people don't<br />

really believe that those things actually happened, they<br />

nevertheless can inspire people to live a good life, to overcome<br />

existential angst, to realize new potentialities, to resurrect<br />

hope in the midst of despair-blah, blah, blah." He shrugged his<br />

shoulders. "Sorry," he said, "I've heard this stuff so much,<br />

itcomes out my ears!<br />

So these liberals say historical research can't possibly discover<br />

the Jesus of faith, because the Jesus of faith is not rooted in<br />

history. He's merely a symbol," Boyd continued. "But listen:<br />

Jesus is not a symbol of anything unless he's rooted in history.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Nicene Creed doesn't say, 'We wish these things were true.'

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!