25.01.2020 Views

The Case For Christ

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

honorable burial?"<br />

Apparently, my observation put me in good company. "Luke may have<br />

felt this same discomfort," Craig said, "which would explain why<br />

he added one important detail-Joseph of Arimathea wasn't present<br />

when the official vote was taken. So that would explain things.<br />

But the significant point about Joseph of Arimathea is that he<br />

would not be the sort of person who would have been invented by<br />

<strong>Christ</strong>ian legend or <strong>Christ</strong>ian authors."<br />

I needed more than merely a conclusion on that matter; I wanted<br />

some solid reasoning. "Why not?" I asked.<br />

"Given the early <strong>Christ</strong>ian anger and bitterness toward the Jewish<br />

leaders who had instigated the crucifixion of Jesus," he said,<br />

"it's highly improbable that they would have invented one who did<br />

the right thing by giving Jesus an honorable burial -especially<br />

while all of Jesus' disciples deserted him! Besides, they<br />

wouldn't make up a specific member of a specific group, whom<br />

people could check out for themselves and ask about this. So<br />

Joseph is undoubtedly a historical figure."<br />

Before I could ask a follow-up question, Craig continued. "I'll<br />

add that if this burial by Joseph were a legend that developed<br />

later, you'd expect to find other competing burial traditions<br />

about what happened to Jesus' body. However, you don't find<br />

these at all.<br />

As a result, the majority of New Testament scholars today agree<br />

that the burial account of Jesus is fundamentally reliable. John<br />

A. T. Robinson, the late Cambridge University New Testament<br />

scholar, said the honorable burial of Jesus is one of the<br />

earliest and best-attested facts that we have about the<br />

historical Jesus."<br />

Craig's explanations satisfied me that Jesus' body was indeed<br />

placed in Joseph's tomb. But the creed left an ambiguity:<br />

perhaps, even after the Resurrection, his body remained entombed.<br />

"While the creed says Jesus was crucified, buried, and then<br />

resurrected, it doesn't specifically say the tomb was empty," I<br />

pointed out. "Doesn't this leave room for the possibility that<br />

the Resurrection was only spiritual in nature and that Jesus'<br />

body was still in the tomb?" "<strong>The</strong> creed definitely implies the<br />

empty tomb," Craig countered. "You see, the Jews had a physical<br />

concept of resurrection. <strong>For</strong> them, the primary object of the<br />

resurrection was the bones of the deceased-not even the flesh,<br />

which was thought to be perishable. After the flesh rotted away,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!