25.01.2020 Views

The Case For Christ

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the claims of Jesus <strong>Christ</strong> critically but with an open mind,<br />

there was more than enough evidence for me to believe it.<br />

So I took a step of faith in the same direction the evidence was<br />

pointing, by receiving Jesus as my forgiver and leader, and I<br />

began to relate to him-to the resurrected <strong>Christ</strong>-in a very real<br />

and ongoing way.<br />

In three decades I've had hundreds of specific answers to<br />

prayers, I've had things happen that simply cannot be explained<br />

by natural explanations, and I have experienced a changed life<br />

beyond anything I could have imagined."<br />

But, I protested, people experience life change in other<br />

religions whose tenets contradict <strong>Christ</strong>ianity. "Isn't it<br />

dangerous to base a decision on subjective experiences?" I asked.<br />

"Let me make two things clear," he said. "First, I'm not saying,<br />

'Just trust your experience.' I'm saying, 'Use your mind calmly<br />

and weigh the evidence, and then let experience be a confirming<br />

piece of evidence.' Second, if what this evidence points to is<br />

true-that is, if all these lines of evidence really do point to<br />

the resurrection of Jesus-the evidence itself begs for an<br />

experiential test."<br />

"Define that," I said.<br />

<strong>The</strong> experiential test is, 'He's still alive, and I can find out<br />

by relating to him.' If you were on a jury and heard enough<br />

evidence to convince you of someone's guilt, it wouldn't make<br />

sense to stop short of the final step of convicting him. And for<br />

people to accept the evidence for the resurrection of Jesus and<br />

not take the final step of testing it experientially would be to<br />

miss where the evidence is ultimately pointing."<br />

"So," I said, "if the evidence points strongly in this direction,<br />

it's only rational and logical to follow it into the experiential<br />

realm." He nodded in approval. "That's precisely right," he said.<br />

"It's the final confirmation of the evidence. In fact, I'll say<br />

this: the evidence screams out for the experiential test."<br />

Deliberations<br />

Questions for Reflection or Group Study<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> disciples were in the unique position of knowing for<br />

certain whether Jesus had returned from the dead, and they were<br />

willing to die for their conviction that he did. Can you think of<br />

anyone in history who has knowingly and willingly died for a lie?<br />

What degree of certainty would you need before you would be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!