25.01.2020 Views

The Case For Christ

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WHAT'S THE AFFIRMATIVE EVIDENCE?<br />

I had spent the first part of our interview peppering Craig with<br />

objections and arguments challenging the empty tomb. But I<br />

suddenly realized that I hadn't given him the opportunity to<br />

spell out his affirmative case. While he had already alluded to<br />

several reasons why he believes Jesus' tomb was unoccupied, I<br />

said, "Why don't you give me, your best shot? Convince me with<br />

your top four or five reasons that the empty tomb is a historical<br />

fact."<br />

Craig rose to the challenge. One by one he spelled out his<br />

arguments concisely and powerfully.<br />

"First," he said, "the empty tomb is definitely implicit in the<br />

early tradition that is passed along by Paul in I Corinthians 15,<br />

which is a very old and reliable source of historical information<br />

about Jesus. Second, the site of Jesus' tomb was known to<br />

<strong>Christ</strong>ian and Jew alike. So if it weren't empty, it would be<br />

impossible for a movement founded on belief in the Resurrection<br />

to have come into existence in the same city where this man had<br />

been publicly executed and buried. Third, we can tell from the<br />

language, grammar, and style that Mark got his empty tomb storyactually,<br />

his whole passion narrative-from an earlier source. In<br />

fact, there's evidence it was written before A.D. 37, which is<br />

much too early for legend to have seriously corrupted it.<br />

A.N. Sherwin-White, the respected Greco-Roman classical historian<br />

from Oxford University, said it would have been without precedent<br />

anywhere in history for legend to have grown up that fast and<br />

significantly distorted the gospels.<br />

Fourth, there's the simplicity of the empty tomb story in Mark.<br />

Fictional apocryphal accounts from the second century contain all<br />

kinds of flowery narratives, in which Jesus comes out of the tomb<br />

in glory and power, with everybody seeing him, including the<br />

priests, Jewish authorities, and Roman guards. Those are the way<br />

legends read, but these don't come until generations after the<br />

events, which is after eyewitnesses have died off. By contrast,<br />

Mark's account of the story of the empty tomb is stark in its<br />

simplicity and unadorned by theological reflection.<br />

Fifth, the unanimous testimony that the empty tomb was discovered<br />

by women argues for the authenticity of the story, because this<br />

would have been embarrassing for the disciples to admit and most<br />

certainly would have been covered up if this were a legend.<br />

Sixth, the earliest Jewish polemic presupposes the historicity of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!