25.01.2020 Views

The Case For Christ

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

that others cannot witness it."<br />

"That," said Habermas, "is a big problem for the hallucination<br />

theory, since there are repeated accounts of Jesus appearing to<br />

multiple people who reported the same thing.<br />

And there are several other arguments why hallucinations can't<br />

explain away his appearances," he continued. "<strong>The</strong> disciples were<br />

fearful, doubtful, and in despair after the Crucifixion, whereas<br />

people who hallucinate need a fertile mind of expectancy or<br />

anticipation. Peter was hardheaded, for goodness' sake; James was<br />

a skeptic-certainly not good candidates for hallucinations.<br />

Also, hallucinations are comparably rare. <strong>The</strong>y're usually<br />

caused by drugs or bodily deprivation. Chances are, you don't<br />

know anybody who's ever had a hallucination not caused by one of<br />

those two things. Yet we're supposed to believe that over a<br />

course of many weeks, people from all sorts of backgrounds, all<br />

kinds of temperaments, in various places, all experienced<br />

hallucinations? That strains the hypothesis quite a bit, doesn't<br />

it?<br />

Besides, if we establish the gospel accounts as being reliable,<br />

how do you account for the disciples eating with Jesus and<br />

touching him? How does he walk along with two of them on the road<br />

to Emmaus? And what about the empty tomb? If people only thought<br />

they saw Jesus, his body would still be in his grave."<br />

OK, I thought, if it wasn't a hallucination, maybe it was<br />

something more subtle.<br />

"Could this have been an example of group think, in which people<br />

talk each other into seeing something that doesn't exist?" I<br />

asked. "As Michael Martin observed, 'A person full of religious<br />

zeal may see what he or she wants to see, not what is really<br />

there.""O<br />

Habermas laughed. "You know, one of the atheists I debated,<br />

Antony Flew, told me he doesn't like it when other atheists use<br />

that last argument, because it cuts both ways. As Flew said,<br />

'<strong>Christ</strong>ians believe because they want to, but atheists don't<br />

believe because they don't want to!'<br />

Actually, there are several reasons why the disciples couldn't<br />

have talked each other into this. As the center of their faith,<br />

there was too much at stake; they went to their deaths defending<br />

it. Wouldn't some of them rethink the group think at a later date<br />

and recant or just quietly fall away? And what about James, who<br />

didn't believe in Jesus, and Paul, who was a persecutor of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!