25.01.2020 Views

The Case For Christ

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

feats and was a teacher of such people as accept the truth<br />

gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He<br />

was the <strong>Christ</strong>. When Pilate, upon hearing him accused by<br />

men of the highest standing among us, had condemned him to<br />

be crucified, those who had in the first place come to love him<br />

did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he<br />

appeared to them restored to life, for the prophets of God had<br />

prophesied these and countless other marvelous things about him.<br />

And the tribe of <strong>Christ</strong>ians, so called after him, has still to<br />

this day not disappeared.<br />

<strong>The</strong> wealth of corroboration for Jesus was readily evident. "You<br />

agreed this was controversial-what have scholars concluded about<br />

this passage?" I asked.<br />

"Scholarship has gone through three trends about it," he said.<br />

"<strong>For</strong> obvious reasons, the early <strong>Christ</strong>ians thought it was a<br />

wonderful and thoroughly authentic attestation of Jesus and his<br />

resurrection. <strong>The</strong>y loved it. <strong>The</strong>n the entire passage was<br />

questioned by at least some scholars during the Enlightenment.<br />

But today there's a remarkable consensus among both Jewish<br />

and <strong>Christ</strong>ian scholars that the passage as a whole is authentic,<br />

although there may be some interpolations."<br />

I raised an eyebrow. "Interpolations-would you define what you<br />

Mean by that?"<br />

"That means early <strong>Christ</strong>ian copyists inserted some phrases that a<br />

Jewish writer like Josephus would not have written," Yamauchi<br />

said. He pointed to a sentence in the book. "<strong>For</strong> instance, the<br />

first line says, 'About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man.'<br />

That phrase is not normally used of Jesus by <strong>Christ</strong>ians, so it<br />

seems authentic for Josephus. But the next phrase says, 'if<br />

indeed one ought to call him a man.' This implies Jesus was more<br />

than human, which appears to be an interpolation."<br />

I nodded to let him know I was following him so far.<br />

"It goes on to say, '<strong>For</strong> he was one who wrought surprising feats<br />

and was a teacher of such people as accept the truth gladly. He<br />

won over many Jews and many of the Greeks.' That seems to be<br />

quite in accord with the vocabulary Josephus uses elsewhere, and<br />

it's generally considered authentic.<br />

But then there's this unambiguous statement, 'He was the<br />

<strong>Christ</strong>.' That seems to be an interpolation-<br />

Because," I interrupted, "Josephus says in his reference to James<br />

that Jesus was 'called the <strong>Christ</strong>."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!