25.01.2020 Views

The Case For Christ

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Jesus of history, he's powerless and he's meaningless. Unless<br />

he's rooted in reality, unless he established his divinity by<br />

rising from the dead, he's just a feel-good symbol who's as<br />

irrelevant as Santa Claus. But there's good evidence that he's<br />

more than that. I had already heard well-supported eyewitness,<br />

documentary, corroborating, and scientific evidence supporting<br />

the New Testament claim that he is God incarnate, and I was<br />

getting ready to hit the road again to dig out even more<br />

historical material about his character and resurrection.<br />

Meanwhile Greg Boyd isn't a lone voice crying out against the<br />

Jesus Seminar. He's part of a growing crescendo of criticism<br />

coming not just from prominent conservative evangelicals but also<br />

from other well-respected scholars representing a wide variety of<br />

theological backgrounds.<br />

An example was as close as my motel's nightstand, where I<br />

reached over to pick up a book called <strong>The</strong> Real Jesus, which I had<br />

recently purchased. Its author is Dr. Luke Timothy Johnson, the<br />

highly regarded professor of New Testament and <strong>Christ</strong>ian origins<br />

at the Candler School of <strong>The</strong>ology of Emory University. Johnson is<br />

a Roman Catholic who was a Benedictine monk before becoming a<br />

biblical scholar and writing a number of influential books.<br />

Johnson systematically skewers the Jesus Seminar, saying it "by<br />

no means represents the cream of New Testament scholarship," it<br />

follows a process that is "biased against the authenticity of<br />

the gospel traditions," and its results were "already determined<br />

ahead of time." He concludes, "This is not responsible, or even<br />

critical, scholarship. It is a self-indulgent charade."<br />

He goes on to quote other distinguished scholars with similar<br />

opinions, including Dr. Howard Clark Kee, who called the Seminar<br />

"an academic disgrace," and Richard Hayes of Duke University,<br />

whose review of <strong>The</strong> Five Gospels asserted that "the case argued<br />

by this book would not stand up in any court. "<br />

I closed the book and turned off the light. Tomorrow I'd resume<br />

my hunt for evidence that would stand up.<br />

Deliberations<br />

Questions for Reflection or Group Study<br />

1. Have you read news accounts of the Jesus Seminar's opinions?<br />

What was your response to what was reported? Did the articles<br />

give you the impression that the Seminar's findings represent the<br />

opinions of the majority of scholars? What dangers do you see in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!