25.01.2020 Views

The Case For Christ

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Emmanuel College in Oxford, England. He has authored seven books<br />

dealing with Jesus rising from the dead, including <strong>The</strong><br />

Resurrection of Jesus: A Rational Inquiry, <strong>The</strong> Resurrection of<br />

Jesus: An Apologetic; <strong>The</strong> Historical Jesus; and Did Jesus Rise<br />

from the Dead? <strong>The</strong> Resurrection Debate, which was based on his<br />

debate with Flew. Among his other books are Dealing with Doubt<br />

and (with J. P. Moreland) Beyond Death: Exploring the Evidence<br />

for Immortality.<br />

In addition, he coedited In Defense ofMiracles and contributed to<br />

Jesus under Fire and Living Your Faith: Closing the Gap between<br />

Mind and Heart. His one hundred articles have appeared in popular<br />

publications (such as the Saturday Evening Post), scholarly<br />

journals<br />

(including Faith and Philosophy and Religious Studies), and<br />

reference books (for example, <strong>The</strong> Baker Dictionary of <strong>The</strong>ology).<br />

He's also the former president of the Evangelical Philosophical<br />

Society. I don't mean to suggest by my earlier description that<br />

Habermas is unnecessarily combative; he's friendly and selfeffacing<br />

in casual conversations. I just wouldn't want to be on<br />

the other side of a hockey puck-or an argument-from him. He has<br />

an innate radar that helps him zero in on his opponent's<br />

vulnerable points. He also has a tender side, which I would<br />

discover-quite unexpectedly-before our interview was over.<br />

I found Habermas in his no-nonsense office at Liberty University,<br />

where he is currently distinguished professor and chairman of the<br />

Department of Philosophy and <strong>The</strong>ology and director of the<br />

master's program in apologetics. <strong>The</strong> room, with its black file<br />

cabinets, metal desk with simulated wood top, threadbare carpet,<br />

and folding guest chairs, is certainly no showplace. Like its<br />

occupant, it's free from pretension.<br />

"DEAD PEOPLE DON'T DO THAT"<br />

Habermas, sitting behind his desk, rolled up the sleeves of his<br />

blue button-down shirt as I turned on my tape recorder and<br />

started our interview.<br />

"Isn't it true," I began with prosecutorial bluntness, "that<br />

there are absolutely no eyewitnesses to Jesus' resurrection?"<br />

"That's exactly right-there's no descriptive account of the<br />

Resurrection," Habermas replied in an admission that might<br />

surprise<br />

people who only have a casual knowledge of the subject.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!