25.01.2020 Views

The Case For Christ

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

The Case for Christ records Lee Strobel's attempt to "determine if there's credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really is the Son of God." The book consists primarily of interviews between Strobel (a former legal editor at the Chicago Tribune) and biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger. Each interview is based on a simple question, concerning historical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archaeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), and "psychiatric evidence" ("Was Jesus Crazy When He Claimed to Be the Son of God?"). Together, these interviews compose a case brief defending Jesus' divinity, and urging readers to reach a verdict of their own.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eaten, imprisoned. And finally, most of them were executed in<br />

torturous ways.<br />

<strong>For</strong> what? <strong>For</strong> good intentions? No, because they were convinced<br />

beyond a shadow of a doubt that they had seen Jesus <strong>Christ</strong> alive<br />

from the dead. What you can't explain is how this particular<br />

group of men came up with this particular belief without having<br />

had an experience of the resurrected <strong>Christ</strong>. <strong>The</strong>re's no other<br />

adequate explanation." I interrupted with a "Yes, but . . ."<br />

objection. "Yes," I agreed, "they were willing to die for their<br />

beliefs. But," I added, "so have Muslims and Mormons and<br />

followers of Jim Jones and David Koresh. This may show that they<br />

were fanatical, but let's face it: it doesn't prove that what<br />

they believed is true."<br />

"Wait a minute-think carefully about the difference," Moreland<br />

insisted as he swiveled to face me head-on, planting both of his<br />

feet firmly on the floor.<br />

"Muslims might be willing to die for their belief that Allah<br />

revealed himself to Muhammad, but this revelation was not done in<br />

a publicly observable way. So they could be wrong about it. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

may sincerely think it's true, but they can't know for a fact,<br />

because they didn't witness it themselves.<br />

"However, the apostles were willing to die for something they had<br />

seen with their own eyes and touched with their own hands. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

were in a unique position not to just believe Jesus rose from the<br />

dead but to know for sure. And when you've got eleven credible<br />

people with no ulterior motives, with nothing to gain and a lot<br />

to lose, who all agree they observed something with their own<br />

eyes-now you've got some difficulty explaining that away."<br />

I smiled because I had been playing devil's advocate by raising<br />

my objection. Actually, I knew he was right. In fact, this<br />

critical distinction was pivotal in my own spiritual journey.<br />

It had been put to me this way: People will die for their<br />

religious beliefs if they sincerely believe they're true, but<br />

people won't die for their religious beliefs if they know their<br />

beliefs are false. While most people can only have faith that<br />

their beliefs are true, the disciples were in a position to know<br />

without a doubt whether or not Jesus had risen from the dead.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y claimed that they saw him, talked with him, and ate with<br />

him. If they weren't absolutely certain, they wouldn't have<br />

allowed themselves to be tortured to death for proclaiming that<br />

the Resurrection had happened .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!