19.12.2012 Views

Anemia of Prematurity - Portal Neonatal

Anemia of Prematurity - Portal Neonatal

Anemia of Prematurity - Portal Neonatal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TREATMENT Section 6 <strong>of</strong> 10<br />

Medical Care: The single most important factor to ensure proper treatment <strong>of</strong> the fetus with hydrops is<br />

a precise and detailed diagnosis. Until the underlying pathophysiology is clearly understood and the<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> the abnormalities leading the development <strong>of</strong> hydrops is defined completely, any attempt at<br />

treatment is futile and potentially harmful.<br />

• Once the underlying problems are understood completely, address the question <strong>of</strong> whether<br />

the abnormalities present are compatible with life, whether fetal survival would be at the cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> an unacceptably poor quality <strong>of</strong> life, and what the consequences may be for future<br />

generations. Currently, parental involvement and guidance are fundamental requirements and<br />

require full knowledge by the parents <strong>of</strong> all possible potential consequences.<br />

• If the decision is made to continue the pregnancy, the next steps are to decide whether to<br />

intervene with invasive fetal treatment(s) and to determine at what point preterm delivery<br />

represents less risk for the fetus than continued gestation. Because major uncertainties about<br />

these questions inevitably exist, regardless <strong>of</strong> the underlying cause(s), full parental<br />

involvement is essential.<br />

• Decisions about fetal treatment are inevitably uncertain because the necessary evidence is<br />

not available. While many anecdotal approaches are found in the literature, no properly<br />

designed clinical trials are available for the clinician concerned with evidence-based<br />

management.<br />

o Many treatment schemes exist; however, all are based on the biases and experiences <strong>of</strong><br />

the individual author(s). In such circumstances, treatment decisions are difficult,<br />

particularly for the prudent clinician who requires evidence to balance risks against<br />

benefits <strong>of</strong> a specific treatment.<br />

o To further complicate the issue, spontaneous remission <strong>of</strong> the hydropic process has been<br />

reported in hundreds <strong>of</strong> cases. Underlying causes in these cases include cardiac<br />

arrhythmias, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, pulmonary sequestration, cystic<br />

adenomatoid malformation <strong>of</strong> the lung, lysosomal storage diseases, cystic hygroma with<br />

or without Noonan syndrome, both Parvovirus and CMV infections, placental<br />

chorangioma, and idiopathic ascites or pleural effusions. Both clinician(s) and parent(s)<br />

completely must understand that decisions at this point basically are uncertain and<br />

arbitrary.<br />

• Unproven high-risk treatments are easier to accept when they consist <strong>of</strong> procedures targeted<br />

to correct the underlying pathophysiology leading to fetal hydrops. Thus, the most widely<br />

accepted management schemes include fetal transfusion to correct anemia (regardless <strong>of</strong><br />

cause), drug treatments for cardiac arrhythmias, correction or reduction <strong>of</strong> space-occupying<br />

lesions that impede cardiac venous or lymphatic return, and procedures designed to stop fetal<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> blood, regardless <strong>of</strong> cause.<br />

• Treatment reported for fetal arrhythmias has included doing nothing, administering drugs, and<br />

immediate delivery.<br />

o If fetal maturity permits, the most simple and direct approach is obviously delivery <strong>of</strong> the<br />

affected fetus and direct neonatal treatment <strong>of</strong> the arrhythmia.<br />

o When fetal immaturity prevents this approach, use <strong>of</strong> drugs has generally been accepted<br />

as appropriate. However, whether this is justified is not supported by any evidence from<br />

controlled clinical trials, and the frequency with which spontaneous cessation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

arrhythmia and remission <strong>of</strong> the hydrops has been reported should promote more<br />

skepticism and caution about fetal drug treatment than generally has been standard.<br />

o Drugs have been administered to the mother (oral, intramuscular, intravenous), to the<br />

fetus (intraperitoneal, intramuscular, intravenous via cordocentesis), and to both,<br />

attempting to correct fetal arrhythmias.<br />

o Even fetal pacing has been reported. As perhaps expected, the failures are infrequently<br />

reported while the successes serve as topics for case or case-series reports (ie, reporting<br />

bias). Such treatment is not without risk, partly consequent to the drugs used and not<br />

uncommonly related to the mode <strong>of</strong> administration.<br />

o Drugs used have included digitalis, furosemide, flecainide, verapamil, amiodarone,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!