06.09.2021 Views

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Unit 6<br />

__________________________________________________________________<br />

CONTRACT FORMATION<br />

Part Four<br />

__________________________________________________________________<br />

Acceptance<br />

FOCUS OF THIS UNIT<br />

You should now know what qualifies as an offer and when an offer terminates.<br />

The next question in contract <strong>for</strong>mation is whether an open offer as been accepted.<br />

So what exactly do we mean when we talk about contractual “acceptance”?<br />

Offer Controls Acceptance. When we say that the offeror is “master of the<br />

offer,” we mean that the offeror gets to define how the offer must be accepted. For<br />

example, suppose the authors approached you and said, “We will pay you $20 if you<br />

will stand up on one leg in the middle of your Property class, flap your arms like a<br />

bird, and recite the first paragraph of the Preamble to the Communist Manifesto. We<br />

don’t want your promise; we’ll pay you only if you actually do it.” 1 Based on that offer,<br />

then the only way you can accept it is by doing exactly what we said. If you say, “I<br />

accept,” you haven’t, in fact, acceptance, because we clearly told you that we didn’t<br />

want your acceptance. There is no contract. You are not obliged to do anything at that<br />

point, and we are free to revoke our offer. If, in fact, you stand on both legs, or you<br />

recite the Preamble to the United States Constitution, you have not accepted the<br />

offer. Being “master of the offer” simply means that the offeror has the power to<br />

specify exactly how an offer can be accepted.<br />

Notice that while our definition of an “offer” does take into account whether<br />

the offeree reasonably believes there is an offer, we do not concern ourselves with<br />

whether he believes he has accepted. Instead, to accomplish the latter, the offeree<br />

must do what the offeror says. Intent is not usually the key. This point may seem<br />

obvious, but problems arise from the fact that in the real world—the world in which<br />

contract law must actually operate—people are not necessarily precise about what<br />

they want or what they are doing. Ordinary people rarely recite, “I hereby accept your<br />

1 [We have been advised by our counsel to clearly say “Just kidding!” at this point to prevent<br />

you from suing us <strong>for</strong> twenty dollars after you embarrass yourself and annoy your Property professor.<br />

But see Leonard v. PepsiCo (holding that an over-the-top joke did not constitute an offer) – Eds.]<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

UNIT 6: ACCEPTANCE 95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!