06.09.2021 Views

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

equirements of a contract were met. Over time judges began shrinking the scope of<br />

the statute and inventing exceptions <strong>for</strong> certain sets of facts. While many judges<br />

strongly support the idea of the statute, many others would like to see it abolished,<br />

being convinced that it causes more fraud than it prevents. The Restatement (Second)<br />

of <strong>Contract</strong>s has an entire chapter entitled the “The Statute of Frauds” covering<br />

sections 110 through 150. Skimming that chapter will give you some idea of the scope<br />

and extent of exceptions that have developed.<br />

The British Parliament effectively repealed the original Statute of Frauds in<br />

1954, so it no longer applies in the place of its birth. The United Nations Convention<br />

on the International Sale of Goods also does not contain a requirement that contracts<br />

be in writing. Statutes of frauds are, however, alive and well in the United States,<br />

creating an area where <strong>American</strong> contract law differs significantly both from civil<br />

code countries (like most of Continental Europe, <strong>for</strong> instance) and even from other<br />

common law countries. To be clear, contracts in other legal systems commonly are in<br />

writing and those writings are given effect. Everyone recognizes that a writing can<br />

add certainty to a transaction. The rest of the world is simply not as enamored with<br />

the requirement of a writing as <strong>American</strong>s are.<br />

What Does It Mean To Be Within the Statute? Samuel Goldwyn, the movie<br />

mogul, allegedly once said that “An oral contract isn’t worth the paper it’s written<br />

on.” By now you should know that Goldwyn’s statement is not entirely accurate. Oral<br />

contracts are just as en<strong>for</strong>ceable as written ones—unless they fall within the statute.<br />

Notice that language. A contract is said to be “within the statute” if a writing is<br />

required. If a contract is the kind <strong>for</strong> which no writing is required, such as an<br />

employment contract <strong>for</strong> a year, it is not “within” the statute.<br />

Standing on MY LEGS. Two broad kinds of questions arise under the statute<br />

of frauds. The first is which contracts are covered. The second is what counts as a<br />

suitable signed writing. A complete list of contracts where writings are required<br />

would vary greatly from state to state. Nonetheless, six “classic” categories derive<br />

from the original English statute and are so common in <strong>American</strong> jurisdictions that<br />

they are embodied in the overall list contained in section 110 of the Restatement<br />

(Second) of <strong>Contract</strong>s and—<strong>for</strong> sales of goods—section 2-201 of the Uni<strong>for</strong>m<br />

Commercial Code. You should read those two legal authorities now.<br />

<strong>Law</strong> students <strong>for</strong> generations have memorized these six categories, many of<br />

them using the mnemonic MY LEGS, which we offer you in the list below. We<br />

recommend that you briefly review the Restatement and the UCC sections cited in<br />

the list.<br />

M <strong>Contract</strong>s in contemplation of MARRIAGE. This rule covers, <strong>for</strong><br />

example, prenuptial agreements or family promises to convey property to the new<br />

couple. See Restatement (Second) of <strong>Contract</strong>s § 124.<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

UNIT 14: THE STATUTE OF FRAUDS 261

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!