06.09.2021 Views

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Unit 19<br />

__________________________________________________________________<br />

TERMS AND INTERPRETATION<br />

Part Three<br />

__________________________________________________________________<br />

Conditions<br />

FOCUS OF THIS UNIT<br />

Conditional Obligations. Parties to contracts make promises that they will do<br />

things. But sometimes those promises are supposed to be per<strong>for</strong>med only if something<br />

happens to trigger a duty. Suppose, <strong>for</strong> example, you buy a single-premium life<br />

insurance policy, which costs you $100,000 but will pay your estate $2 million<br />

whenever you die. You, the insured, have no obligation to die. But the insurance<br />

company has no obligation to pay money to your estate until you do. The contract is<br />

in <strong>for</strong>ce, and you have fully per<strong>for</strong>med, but the insurer’s duty is conditional on the<br />

occurrence of your death. If <strong>for</strong> some reason you to manage to live <strong>for</strong>ever, the contract<br />

will last <strong>for</strong>ever but you will never get the money. The best way to think of conditions<br />

is as triggers to obligations that occur within contracts.<br />

Two broad categories of conditions exist: express and implied. In both, the party<br />

refusing to per<strong>for</strong>m claims its duty was never triggered because the other party did<br />

not satisfy the condition. The party seeking per<strong>for</strong>mance may claim variously that (1)<br />

properly interpreted, the claimed condition is not a condition at all; (2) that there is<br />

a condition, but it was in fact complied with; (3) even if the condition was not strictly<br />

complied with, there is a good excuse <strong>for</strong> not doing so; or (4) some or all of the above.<br />

Spotting Express Conditions. You can often recognize express conditions by<br />

phrases like “if . . . then,” “provided that,” “upon the occurrence of,” and the like. The<br />

established hornbook law, repeated by many courts, is that express conditions like<br />

these must be complied with strictly. But, as you will also see in this unit, there are<br />

ways that a party can get by with something less than strict compliance.<br />

Unseen Implied Conditions. Implied or constructive conditions are those read<br />

into the contract by courts, in much the same way as other implied terms. Conditions<br />

are usually implied when it appears that the parties intended that per<strong>for</strong>mance occur<br />

in a particular sequence. The leading English case is Kingston v. Preston, 99 Eng.<br />

Rep. 437 (K.B. 1773), which involved the sale of a business. The seller agreed to<br />

convey the business, and the buyer agreed to put up a bond to ensure payment <strong>for</strong><br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

UNIT 19: CONDITIONS 381

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!