06.09.2021 Views

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Problems<br />

Problem 18.1<br />

Pantera’s is a chain of “café-style” restaurants. It enters into a contract with<br />

Shopping Center to put a Pantera café in the center. As part of the negotiations,<br />

Pantera’s insists that it wants to limit competition within the center. The Center has<br />

other tenants, however, who also serve food. After negotiation, the parties agree to<br />

the following language:<br />

Center agrees not to enter into a lease, occupancy agreement or license<br />

affecting space in the Shopping Center or consent to an amendment to an<br />

existing lease permitting use . . . <strong>for</strong> a bakery or restaurant reasonably<br />

expected to have annual sales of sandwiches greater than ten percent<br />

(10%) of its total sales or primarily <strong>for</strong> the sale of high quality coffees or teas,<br />

such as, but not limited to, Starbucks, Tea-Luxe, Pete's Coffee and Tea,<br />

and Finagle a Bagle. The <strong>for</strong>egoing shall not apply to (i) a business serving<br />

near-Eastern food and related products, (ii) restaurants primarily <strong>for</strong><br />

sit-down table service, (iii) a KFC restaurant, and (iv) a Papa Gino's<br />

restaurant (provided the same continues to operate with substantially the<br />

same categories of menu items as now apply to its stores and franchisees<br />

generally).<br />

The parties sign the contract, the Pantera café opens, and it becomes<br />

successful. Subsequently, Shopping Center is approached by Adoba, a national chain<br />

of “Mexican Grills” that serve various items in a café-style setting that does not<br />

involve sit-down table service. On learning of these discussions, Panera’s protests,<br />

claiming that burritos, tacos, and quesadillas are “sandwiches” and that they account<br />

<strong>for</strong> more than 10 percent of Adoba’s sales. Pantera’s sues, asking <strong>for</strong> an injunction<br />

against its claimed violation of the lease. What result and why?<br />

Problem 18.2<br />

Homeowner lives in a coastal community that is sometimes subject to<br />

hurricanes. She has a “homeowner’s insurance” policy on her home, issued by<br />

Arcturus Life & Casualty Co., an insurer licensed in Homeowner’s state. The<br />

Arcturus policy, a standard <strong>for</strong>m used by many different insurers, provides that it<br />

will cover “direct physical loss to structures on the property” from any cause, except<br />

<strong>for</strong> “excluded perils.” Among the list of “excluded perils” is:<br />

Damage from . . . flood, surface water, waves, tidal water, overflow of a<br />

body of water, or spray from any of these, whether or not driven by wind.<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

UNIT 18: THE INTERPRETIVE TOOLBOX 379

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!