- Page 2 and 3:
___________________________________
- Page 4 and 5:
Notices This is the first edition o
- Page 6 and 7:
About CALI eLangdell Press The Cent
- Page 8 and 9:
Unit 19: Conditions ...............
- Page 10 and 11:
___________________________________
- Page 12 and 13:
hired Corleone family thugs 4 or an
- Page 14 and 15:
described herein, and agrees to fre
- Page 16 and 17:
6. MARY BETH WHITEHEAD, Surrogate,
- Page 18 and 19:
Surrogate and WILLIAM STERN, Natura
- Page 20 and 21:
10. Consider paragraph 5. Should th
- Page 22 and 23:
The two court opinions that follow
- Page 24 and 25:
Venue Venue is a concept of place
- Page 26 and 27:
Their first child, Ryan, was born o
- Page 28 and 29:
Subsequent to entering into the sur
- Page 30 and 31:
The sixth and final argument sugges
- Page 32 and 33:
It is argued by amicus that the $ 1
- Page 34 and 35:
no stated public policy on surrogac
- Page 36 and 37:
IN RE BABY M Supreme Court of New J
- Page 38 and 39:
adoption; the sole purpose of the c
- Page 40 and 41:
The surrogacy contract violates the
- Page 42 and 43:
Problems Donald Donor is a single,
- Page 44 and 45:
An Introduction to CONTRACT FORMATI
- Page 46 and 47:
particular obligation? In Europe, i
- Page 48 and 49:
The evidence is undisputed that pla
- Page 50 and 51:
After some negotiation a price of $
- Page 52 and 53:
The answer of A.H. Zehmer admitted
- Page 54 and 55:
no, that is beer and liquor talking
- Page 56 and 57:
on the Zehmers as well as on himsel
- Page 58 and 59:
offer and of the reward and its sub
- Page 60 and 61:
your professor. You will come acros
- Page 62 and 63:
car title you’re holding there. I
- Page 64 and 65:
In the modern world, the question o
- Page 66 and 67:
pair of sunglasses. The drumroll th
- Page 68 and 69:
This letter was apparently sent onw
- Page 70 and 71:
Because these cases generally invol
- Page 72 and 73:
teenager’s schoolmates gape in ad
- Page 74 and 75:
Review Question 3. Note how Judge W
- Page 76 and 77:
cash in ten days,” it must be dee
- Page 78 and 79:
“Before a contract can be complet
- Page 80 and 81:
for the purpose of doing the work a
- Page 82 and 83:
accidentally being bound to unwante
- Page 84 and 85:
___________________________________
- Page 86 and 87:
Here, we have a counter-offer. The
- Page 88 and 89:
parties.” Metropolitan Sports Fac
- Page 90 and 91:
court. See Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 10
- Page 92 and 93:
Thus, it clearly appears that the d
- Page 94 and 95:
with distribution. The parties ulti
- Page 96 and 97:
all essential terms. See, e.g., Sit
- Page 98 and 99:
Enclosed, we beg to hand you contra
- Page 100 and 101:
to call for an acceptance particula
- Page 102 and 103:
than identify himself, Dealer says,
- Page 104 and 105:
offer.” More often, they nod, sha
- Page 106 and 107:
The next attack will be my end, I a
- Page 108 and 109:
from all the facts and circumstance
- Page 110 and 111:
Notice to the agent, within the sco
- Page 112 and 113:
2. Written approval by United State
- Page 114 and 115: contrary in the offer, the acceptan
- Page 116 and 117: HOBBS v. MASSASOIT WHIP CO. Supreme
- Page 118 and 119: stranger may impose a duty upon ano
- Page 120 and 121: contract in this case come into exi
- Page 122 and 123: ___________________________________
- Page 124 and 125: An Introduction to CONSIDERATION Th
- Page 126 and 127: and you are free to change your min
- Page 128 and 129: Ridge Runner that she lacked the pr
- Page 130 and 131: We conclude that the territory enco
- Page 132 and 133: He further answered, that it was gi
- Page 134 and 135: This action was brought upon an all
- Page 136 and 137: consideration does in fact benefit
- Page 138 and 139: Review Question 5. The promisors in
- Page 140 and 141: The distinction between such a cond
- Page 142 and 143: Vincent refuses. Fritz eventually s
- Page 144 and 145: enefit was money received, the subs
- Page 146 and 147: they stopped work in a body, and de
- Page 148 and 149: supervise this building. Under the
- Page 150 and 151: The day before trial the plaintiffs
- Page 152 and 153: General rules of law established fo
- Page 154 and 155: For the foregoing reasons we are al
- Page 156 and 157: WEBB v. McGOWIN Court of Appeals of
- Page 158 and 159: 100 P. 631 (Kan. 1909); Edson v. Po
- Page 160 and 161: McGowin’s adult child, would that
- Page 162 and 163: efuses, saying, “We had a deal.
- Page 166 and 167: BLICESTER: That’s crazy. JUDGE: N
- Page 168 and 169: A. She took the piece of paper and
- Page 170 and 171: According to the undisputed proof,
- Page 172 and 173: We recognize that upon different fa
- Page 174 and 175: was discussed with compensation to
- Page 176 and 177: CONRAD v. FIELDS Court of Appeals o
- Page 178 and 179: her job at Qwest and enroll in law
- Page 180 and 181: Seth Wyman’s estranged son Levi i
- Page 182 and 183: An Introduction to ALTERNATIVE REGI
- Page 184 and 185: consistency. Some provisions have p
- Page 186 and 187: TOUSLEY-BIXLER CONSTRUCTION CO. v.
- Page 188 and 189: of goods within this Article whethe
- Page 190 and 191: differently from other contracts? F
- Page 192 and 193: nine units was delivered and paid f
- Page 194 and 195: think they have struck a deal.” Q
- Page 196 and 197: more sense for contract formation t
- Page 198 and 199: COMMERCIAL CODE § 2-206:12 (3D ED.
- Page 200 and 201: face of which appears the notation,
- Page 202 and 203: Problem 10.3 On June 1, the sales d
- Page 204 and 205: except for personal use. If, howeve
- Page 206 and 207: [T]he plain reading of the statute
- Page 208 and 209: not lubricated in any way. Without
- Page 210 and 211: we also note that Best Bolt’s vic
- Page 212 and 213: (c) are fit for the ordinary purpos
- Page 214 and 215:
This purchase order represents the
- Page 216 and 217:
provision would cause no “surpris
- Page 218 and 219:
FLENDER CORPORATION v. TIPPINS INTE
- Page 220 and 221:
well that the reservations each par
- Page 222 and 223:
The alternate approach, recognized
- Page 224 and 225:
(a) Is Ivy League University a “m
- Page 226 and 227:
and ratified a treaty called the Un
- Page 228 and 229:
(2) The fact that the parties have
- Page 230 and 231:
e. Manufacturer in Texas contracts
- Page 232 and 233:
an authorized distributor of Defend
- Page 234 and 235:
undisputed that each of these alleg
- Page 236 and 237:
Treaty Text Note. Read Articles 18,
- Page 238 and 239:
*4 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 26, 2009); see a
- Page 240 and 241:
perform a substantial part of his o
- Page 242 and 243:
shall be settled by binding arbitra
- Page 244 and 245:
An Introduction to CONTRACT DEFENSE
- Page 246 and 247:
___________________________________
- Page 248 and 249:
which extended even to being able t
- Page 250 and 251:
Dickerson, 72 Ala. 318 (1882). In t
- Page 252 and 253:
loss from the transaction, includin
- Page 254 and 255:
this definition. Whether other area
- Page 256 and 257:
ORTELERE v. TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT
- Page 258 and 259:
medicine, this physician “judged
- Page 260 and 261:
The avoidance of duties under an ag
- Page 262 and 263:
7. What is my total service credit?
- Page 264 and 265:
Review Question 5. In McGovern v. C
- Page 266 and 267:
will pay the full listed price of $
- Page 268 and 269:
endeavoured to be upheld by Perjury
- Page 270 and 271:
Y Contracts that cannot be performe
- Page 272 and 273:
you think the consideration doctrin
- Page 274 and 275:
NICKELS, J., dissenting. I disagree
- Page 276 and 277:
contracts. What is the real purpose
- Page 278 and 279:
At the ensuing trial, defendant den
- Page 280 and 281:
There may be cases in which it woul
- Page 282 and 283:
professional. Things were really ge
- Page 284 and 285:
GUENTHER v. AMER-TEX CONSTRUCTION C
- Page 286 and 287:
(b) Subsection (a) of this section
- Page 288 and 289:
Problem 14.3 Van der Rohe USA, Inc.
- Page 290 and 291:
sold, the terms of the sale, the na
- Page 292 and 293:
the judgment of a vulnerable party.
- Page 294 and 295:
The first issue is whether the labe
- Page 296 and 297:
some point or on some occasion it w
- Page 298 and 299:
As a matter of law, based on the fa
- Page 300 and 301:
or, more particularly, in cases suc
- Page 302 and 303:
“deprived Loral of its free will.
- Page 304 and 305:
As to mistake, the amended complain
- Page 306 and 307:
In Weger v. Rocha, 32 P.2d 417 (Cal
- Page 308 and 309:
I had brought back the topaz, and h
- Page 310 and 311:
May 5, 1886, plaintiff went out to
- Page 312 and 313:
arren cow is substantially a differ
- Page 314 and 315:
prior to the sale was Buyer aware t
- Page 316 and 317:
Against Public Policy. In many situ
- Page 318 and 319:
HANKS v. POWDER RIDGE RESTAURANT CO
- Page 320 and 321:
interest adversely, and identified
- Page 322 and 323:
illogical, in these circumstances,
- Page 324 and 325:
_____________________ Review Questi
- Page 326 and 327:
construed against the employer). Th
- Page 328 and 329:
acquired by virtue of effort and ex
- Page 330 and 331:
_____________________ Review Questi
- Page 332 and 333:
Mere inadequacy of consideration wi
- Page 334 and 335:
District of Columbia Court of Appea
- Page 336 and 337:
In determining reasonableness or fa
- Page 338 and 339:
Problems Problem 16.1 The Californi
- Page 340 and 341:
position to all of his patients (or
- Page 342 and 343:
An Introduction to TERMS AND INTERP
- Page 344 and 345:
___________________________________
- Page 346 and 347:
contract itself. Thus written docum
- Page 348 and 349:
consideration of the simultaneous a
- Page 350 and 351:
the contract on the basis of which
- Page 352 and 353:
The subject-matter of the written c
- Page 354 and 355:
understandings or agreements.” 3
- Page 356 and 357:
little time to compose it . . . . A
- Page 358 and 359:
expressed in the writing. KN Energy
- Page 360 and 361:
Article 8 UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION
- Page 362 and 363:
contracts or that parol evidence re
- Page 364 and 365:
percent (50%) protein, as tested on
- Page 366 and 367:
get the deal they intended, and the
- Page 368 and 369:
Cases and Materials W.W.W. ASSOCIAT
- Page 370 and 371:
do so because of some identified am
- Page 372 and 373:
The truth is that whatever virtue a
- Page 374 and 375:
Absent strong public policy conside
- Page 376 and 377:
FRIGALIMENT IMPORTING CO. v. B.N.S.
- Page 378 and 379:
persuasive if sustained by the reco
- Page 380 and 381:
and there is force in defendant’s
- Page 382 and 383:
RANDOM HOUSE, INC. v. ROSETTA BOOKS
- Page 384 and 385:
language of the grant was broad, en
- Page 386 and 387:
F.3d at 1095, would conclude that t
- Page 388 and 389:
When Hurricane Rubin strikes the lo
- Page 390 and 391:
the business. The contract was sile
- Page 392 and 393:
party argues ambiguity), the loan f
- Page 394 and 395:
accordance with the terms of this c
- Page 396 and 397:
of the advance payments, or the num
- Page 398 and 399:
imbibe alcoholic beverages and stil
- Page 400 and 401:
significant satisfied requirement o
- Page 402 and 403:
TOWN OF FAIRFIELD v. D’ADDARIO Su
- Page 404 and 405:
damages. The notice of Kant’s act
- Page 406 and 407:
who had turned down lucrative offer
- Page 408 and 409:
were to suggest some express provis
- Page 410 and 411:
notice of ninety days. The plaintif
- Page 412 and 413:
Review Question 2. What was Judge C
- Page 414 and 415:
exercising discretion under the con
- Page 416 and 417:
NANAKULI PAVING AND ROCK CO. v. SHE
- Page 418 and 419:
§ 490:1-102(2)(b). The drafters of
- Page 420 and 421:
trade existed in Hawaii in 1969 and
- Page 422 and 423:
1978) (unpublished opinion) (holdin
- Page 424 and 425:
Plaintiff does not contest its stat
- Page 426 and 427:
product. The concept of “merchant
- Page 428 and 429:
discovery by defendant of the defec
- Page 430 and 431:
Unfortunately, Plumber’s work doe
- Page 432 and 433:
An Introduction to PERFORMANCE AND
- Page 434 and 435:
___________________________________
- Page 436 and 437:
doctrine, so that close-enough perf
- Page 438 and 439:
the number of joists used in all th
- Page 440 and 441:
JACOB & YOUNGS, INC. v. KENT Court
- Page 442 and 443:
transgressor must accept the penalt
- Page 444 and 445:
was for requiring this kind of pipe
- Page 446 and 447:
The evidence is undisputed that the
- Page 448 and 449:
eing a new roof. We are not prepare
- Page 450 and 451:
This case is simple if the perfect
- Page 452 and 453:
yacht remained located at SIYS’ f
- Page 454 and 455:
happens by mere operation of law; s
- Page 456 and 457:
Problems Problem 21.1 Actor is a ve
- Page 458 and 459:
processor for the same price as the
- Page 460 and 461:
venue. Under Paradine v. Jane, this
- Page 462 and 463:
At trial, the court allowed IH’s
- Page 464 and 465:
In order for a supervening event to
- Page 466 and 467:
The court interpreted this passage
- Page 468 and 469:
economic circumstances sufficiently
- Page 470 and 471:
A cancellation order given by her o
- Page 472 and 473:
e entitled to judgment. They certai
- Page 474 and 475:
performance is excused when unfores
- Page 476 and 477:
caused to communications and transp
- Page 478 and 479:
Following the closing of the above-
- Page 480 and 481:
performance. 407 East 61st Garage,
- Page 482 and 483:
Canal, across the Mediterranean thr
- Page 484 and 485:
An Introduction to REMEDIES We now
- Page 486 and 487:
___________________________________
- Page 488 and 489:
multiplication and (very rarely) di
- Page 490 and 491:
It was also erroneous and misleadin
- Page 492 and 493:
and we turn to the question of whet
- Page 494 and 495:
testified that the total gas, oil,
- Page 496 and 497:
BRANDEIS MACHINERY & SUPPLY CO., LL
- Page 498 and 499:
PEEVYHOUSE v. GARLAND COAL & MINING
- Page 500 and 501:
explanation as to why a measure of
- Page 502 and 503:
work; however, where the contract p
- Page 504 and 505:
clear and unambiguous and the parti
- Page 506 and 507:
pool contractor to finish the pool
- Page 508 and 509:
___________________________________
- Page 510 and 511:
Nevertheless, the English courts he
- Page 512 and 513:
perform the work. As Lee failed to
- Page 514 and 515:
UNITED STATES ex rel. COASTAL STEEL
- Page 516 and 517:
emanded for those findings. When th
- Page 518 and 519:
the substance is that the plaintiff
- Page 520 and 521:
the agreement would continue on a m
- Page 522 and 523:
Review Question 7. Note the paralle
- Page 524 and 525:
product that would be fully functio
- Page 526 and 527:
car to the Country Music Museum for
- Page 528 and 529:
___________________________________
- Page 530 and 531:
Restatement (Second) of Contracts s
- Page 532 and 533:
Harrahs brings the instant action a
- Page 534 and 535:
contest payment for same if constru
- Page 536 and 537:
This is in accord with the earlier
- Page 538 and 539:
Defendant’s sole defense to this
- Page 540 and 541:
particular. Certainly, none of the
- Page 542 and 543:
sustained where, from the nature of
- Page 544 and 545:
ut will be happy to try to help in
- Page 546 and 547:
the full $7,500 price of admission
- Page 548 and 549:
Problem 25.2 Mina is a second-year
- Page 550 and 551:
___________________________________
- Page 552 and 553:
other types of specific performance
- Page 554 and 555:
imposed as the remedy for breach of
- Page 556 and 557:
certainty, then S&M should be compe
- Page 558 and 559:
There is simply no requirement in t
- Page 560 and 561:
“other proper circumstances” th
- Page 562 and 563:
fence plaintiff erected to discoura
- Page 564 and 565:
y no means certain, at the time of
- Page 566 and 567:
cannot use that method of self-help
- Page 568 and 569:
contract price of $533,000) that La
- Page 570 and 571:
teacher resigned at the beginning,
- Page 572 and 573:
eaching its lease with Perez by the
- Page 574 and 575:
___________________________________
- Page 576 and 577:
An Introduction to CONTRACT NONPART
- Page 578 and 579:
___________________________________
- Page 580 and 581:
fraud, mistake, and illegality. If
- Page 582 and 583:
may be the diversity of opinion els
- Page 584 and 585:
given him by the will for a particu
- Page 586 and 587:
since Lawrence v. Fox in a desire t
- Page 588 and 589:
workers’ compensation benefits),
- Page 590 and 591:
to divide a lawyer’s loyalty betw
- Page 592 and 593:
Review Question 9. Lawyers do many
- Page 594 and 595:
Problems Problem 27.1 Hank and Hild
- Page 596 and 597:
___________________________________
- Page 598 and 599:
interested in jumping into such a b
- Page 600 and 601:
limitations barred the claims. She
- Page 602 and 603:
assigned their claim to recover the
- Page 604 and 605:
application to this contract as it
- Page 606 and 607:
A breach of contract has been defin
- Page 608 and 609:
moved to Arizona and had no further
- Page 610 and 611:
It is evident from the express lang
- Page 612 and 613:
contracted to assume, and the assig
- Page 614:
March 1 for the conveyance of Purpl