06.09.2021 Views

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Unit 20<br />

__________________________________________________________________<br />

TERMS AND INTERPRETATION<br />

Part Four<br />

__________________________________________________________________<br />

Implied Terms<br />

FOCUS OF THIS UNIT<br />

By now you should understand the concept that what most non-lawyers think<br />

of as “the contract”—the written document—is only part of the larger “agreement”<br />

between the parties. Furthermore, this agreement is only part of that total web of<br />

obligations that lawyers call “the contract.” As you saw in the discussion of the parol<br />

evidence rule, oral terms agreed to by the parties may be part of the deal alongside<br />

the written contract document. But can terms become part of a contract if the parties<br />

have never addressed them at all? The answer, perhaps surprisingly, is yes. Two<br />

broad categories of “implied” terms exist that courts will insert into contracts even<br />

when the parties have not expressly agreed to them.<br />

Terms Implied from the Parties’ Deal. It is axiomatic in modern contracts law<br />

that all contracts are, in some fashion, “incomplete.” That is, it would be extremely<br />

time-consuming and probably impossible to address, in advance, every possible issue<br />

that might someday come up under the contract. Certain things that the parties did<br />

not bother to discuss would almost certainly have been included in their contract if<br />

they had been asked about it. If, to take a simple example, a buyer in Manhattan<br />

purchases something from a seller in Brooklyn <strong>for</strong> “$5,000,” the “$” almost certainly<br />

is intended to refer to United States dollars, and not those of, say, Canada or<br />

Singapore. Although the parties never specified United States dollars, courts and<br />

other readers of the contract infer from the circumstances that this is what they<br />

meant. A contract <strong>for</strong> a restaurant meal likewise almost certainly implies a promise<br />

by the restaurant that its food is not poisonous; a contract <strong>for</strong> a new computer implies<br />

a promise that the item will actually work when it is delivered. Here is a classic<br />

<strong>for</strong>mulation of implied terms by one British judge:<br />

Prima facie that which in any contract is left to be implied and need not<br />

be expressed is something so obvious that it goes without saying; so that,<br />

if, while the parties were making their bargain, an officious bystander<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

UNIT 20: IMPLIED TERMS 399

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!