06.09.2021 Views

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Unit 13<br />

__________________________________________________________________<br />

CONTRACT DEFENSES<br />

Part One<br />

__________________________________________________________________<br />

Capacity to <strong>Contract</strong><br />

FOCUS OF THIS UNIT<br />

You may recall from the introduction to the course that one of the requirements<br />

of a valid contract is “competent parties.” A competent party, in legal parlance, is one<br />

who has capacity to contract. The contracts of competent parties are valid, those of<br />

incompetent parties are voidable—that is, they can be undone at the request of the<br />

incompetent party (or, in some cases, that party’s representative). The capacity<br />

requirement is the subject of this unit.<br />

Voluntary and Involuntary Obligation. In general, tort law and criminal law<br />

involuntarily impose legal duties on the persons subject to those laws. As an<br />

individual member of society you do not, <strong>for</strong> instance, have the right to commit a<br />

battery or rob a bank. <strong>Contract</strong> law, in contrast, usually involves taking on legal<br />

duties that would not exist but <strong>for</strong> the voluntary entry into a contractual relationship.<br />

A person has more legal obligations after entering into a contract than she has be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

doing so. Is the ability to take on new duties, incur potential liability, and to limit<br />

one’s future legally really a valuable power? Perhaps counterintuitively (as least<br />

when we frame the question that way), the answer is an emphatic yes. The ability of<br />

parties to legally bind themselves has far-reaching economic and social consequences.<br />

If you cannot legally bind yourself to repay a loan, <strong>for</strong> example, no one is going to give<br />

you one, which means your future options (getting a car or a home or starting a<br />

business) are limited. Similarly, the inability to enter into en<strong>for</strong>ceable agreements<br />

also has economic and social consequences—largely negative ones, as history<br />

demonstrates.<br />

The Consequential Power to <strong>Contract</strong>. In many societies in history, the power<br />

to contract has often been limited to a narrow class of people who use it to help<br />

consolidate their political power. In early Rome, <strong>for</strong> example, only the head of a<br />

family, known as the paterfamilias, had the power to make binding contracts. This<br />

arrangement allowed the heads of the families to maintain their power and authority,<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

UNIT 13: CAPACITY TO CONTRACT 239

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!