06.09.2021 Views

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

car to the Country Music Museum <strong>for</strong> $1,000,001. Elmer returns Titus’s check. Titus<br />

subsequently sues Elmer. As the car has already been conveyed to the Museum,<br />

Titus’s only remedy is damages. What damages can he collect from Elmer? Work<br />

through each of the three categories. Which one would he be advised to seek?<br />

Expectancy damages:<br />

___________________________<br />

Restitution damages:<br />

___________________________<br />

Reliance damages:<br />

___________________________<br />

Problem 24.2<br />

Back in Unit 9, which covered promissory estoppel, you read the case of<br />

Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. There, Joseph Hoffman had extensive, multi-year<br />

negotiations about obtaining a Red Owl grocery store franchise. The two sides never<br />

signed a final contract, but Hoffman sold his bakery, bought a small grocery store to<br />

gain experience, and engaged in other transactions in the midst of representations<br />

made by Red Owl during the negotiations. Hoffman never received a Red Owl<br />

franchise, and he sued Red Owl. While the parties had no contract, the Wisconsin<br />

Supreme Court held that Hoffman could recover based on promissory estoppel. With<br />

regard to damages, the court said “it would be a mistake to regard an action grounded<br />

on promissory estoppel as the equivalent of a breach of contract action” that allowed<br />

<strong>for</strong> recovery of expectancy damages. Instead damages must be based on reliance, and<br />

even reliance damages could be allowed only to the extent that injustice could be<br />

avoided. The case was then remanded to the trial court <strong>for</strong> a new trial on the issue of<br />

damages.<br />

You are a clerk working <strong>for</strong> the trial judge in Hoffman upon its remand.<br />

Assume <strong>for</strong> purposes of this problem that Hoffman is seeking from Red Owl Stores<br />

the categories of damages listed below (which, incidentally, are not the same as those<br />

in the real-life case). The judge has asked you to determine whether each type of<br />

qualifies as expectancy, restitution, or reliance damages, given that only reliance<br />

damages will likely be recoverable. If you think you need more in<strong>for</strong>mation to answer<br />

any of the questions, you should identify the in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

(a) Expected future profits from Hoffman’s bakery, which he sold upon the<br />

recommendation of Red Owl.<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

518 CHAPTER VIII: REMEDIES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!