06.09.2021 Views

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

American Contract Law for a Global Age, 2017a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Unit 11<br />

__________________________________________________________________<br />

ALTERNATIVE REGIMES<br />

Part Two<br />

__________________________________________________________________<br />

Uni<strong>for</strong>m Commercial Code – Merchants and Terms<br />

FOCUS OF THIS UNIT<br />

Article 2 of the Uni<strong>for</strong>m Commercial Code applies to all sales of goods, even if<br />

(<strong>for</strong> example) you sell your classmate a used comic book <strong>for</strong> one dollar. As to its<br />

applicability, the UCC does not have a minimum price or any particular<br />

qualifications <strong>for</strong> buyers or sellers. The transaction need only be one in which title to<br />

goods passes from the seller to the buyer <strong>for</strong> a price. That being said, Article 2 does<br />

contain several special rules that apply only to merchants. This unit will introduce<br />

you to the concept and some of the implications of a there being a UCC “merchant”<br />

on one or both sides of a sales transaction. We will also consider a topic that has been<br />

the bane of generations of students (and professors) of <strong>American</strong> contract law—the<br />

so-called “battle of the <strong>for</strong>ms” under UCC § 2-207. Suffice it to say <strong>for</strong> now that section<br />

2-207 throws out the “last shot rule” of common-law contract <strong>for</strong>mation and replaces<br />

it with . . . something different. It is a little bit complicated.<br />

Merchants and Additional Standards. A recurring tension in <strong>American</strong> law—<br />

not just in contract law—is the question of whether the law should treat all parties<br />

the same regardless of their knowledge or sophistication. The question is frequently<br />

resolved both ways. A healthy dose of equal treatment is embodied in Theodore<br />

Roosevelt’s famous declaration that “no man is above the law and no man is below<br />

it.” On the other hand, some situations seem to call <strong>for</strong> recognition that some parties<br />

are in a position where holding them to a higher standard is reasonable, reflecting<br />

the famous Biblical admonition that “to whom much is given, from him much will be<br />

required.” Or, as football coach Tony Dungy put it, “I need to treat everybody fairly,<br />

but fair doesn't always mean equal.”<br />

Article 2 addresses this tension by creating a special category of buyers and<br />

sellers known as “merchants,” essentially people or organizations who regularly deal<br />

in the goods or practices of selling goods. For example, if law professor Snyder sells<br />

his used car to law professor Burge, the transaction is governed by the UCC, but<br />

neither party is a merchant. Snyder is not a car dealer and Burge does not buy cars<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

UNIT 11: UCC MERCHANTS AND TERMS 195

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!