24.12.2012 Views

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

account their RG evolution. As a result, we extract the value <strong>of</strong> the singlet axial charge<br />

a0(1 GeV 2 ) = 0.33 ± 0.05. This value is very close to the corresponding COMPASS<br />

0.35 ± 0.06 [7] and HERMES 0.35 ± 0.06 [8] results.<br />

Table 1: Combined fit results <strong>of</strong> the proton Γ p<br />

1 (Q2 ) data (elastic contribution excluded). APT fit results a0<br />

AP T and μ4,6,8 (at the scale Q2 0 =1GeV2 ) are given without and with taking into account the RG Q2-evolution <strong>of</strong><br />

a0(Q2 AP T ) and μ4 (Q2 ). The minimal borders <strong>of</strong> fitting domains in Q2 are settled from the ad hoc restriction<br />

χ2 � 1 and monotonous behavior <strong>of</strong> the resulting fitted curves.<br />

Method Q 2 min, GeV 2<br />

a0 μ4/M 2 μ6/M 4 μ8/M 6<br />

0.59 0.33(3) −0.050(4) 0 0<br />

PT 0.35 0.43(5) −0.087(9) 0.024(5) 0<br />

0.29 0.37(5) −0.060(15) -0.001(8) 0.006(5)<br />

0.47 0.35(4) −0.054(4) 0 0<br />

APT 0.17 0.39(3) −0.069(4) 0.0081(8) 0<br />

(no evolution) 0.10 0.43(3) −0.078(4) 0.0132(9) −0.0007(5)<br />

0.47 0.33(4) −0.051(4) 0 0<br />

APT 0.17 0.31(3) −0.059(4) 0.0098(8) 0<br />

(with evolution) 0.10 0.32(4) −0.065(4) 0.0146(9) −0.0006(5)<br />

In order to see how the Q2 min scale and fit results for the μ-terms change with varying<br />

ΛQCD, we have performed three different NLO fits with ΛQCD = 300, 400, 500 MeV. It<br />

turns out that the term μ4 is quite sensitive to the Landau singularity position, and its<br />

value noticeably increases with increasing ΛQCD. The APT is free <strong>of</strong> such a problem<br />

thus providing a reliable tool <strong>of</strong> investigating the behavior <strong>of</strong> higher twist terms extracted<br />

directly from the low-energy data.<br />

In the APT approach the convergence <strong>of</strong> both the higher orders and higher twist series<br />

is much better. In both the nonsinglet and singlet case, while the twist-4 term happened<br />

to be larger in magnitude in the APT than in the conventional PT, the subsequent<br />

terms are essentially smaller and quickly decreasing (as the APT absorbs some part <strong>of</strong><br />

nonperturbative dynamics described by higher twists). This is the main reason <strong>of</strong> the<br />

shift <strong>of</strong> the pQCD frontier to lower Q values. A satisfactory description <strong>of</strong> the proton<br />

spin sum rule data down to Q ∼ ΛQCD � 350 MeV was achieved (see Fig. 1b). In a<br />

sense, this could be natural if the main reason <strong>of</strong> such a success was the disappearance <strong>of</strong><br />

unphysical singularities. Note that the data at very low Q ∼ ΛQCD are usually dropped<br />

from the analysis <strong>of</strong> a0 and higher-twist term in the standard PT analysis because <strong>of</strong><br />

Landau singularities. The compatibility <strong>of</strong> our results for a0 and previous results [7, 8]<br />

demonstrates the universality <strong>of</strong> the nucleon spin structure at large and low Q2 scales.<br />

This work was partially supported by RFBR grants 07-02-91557, 08-01-00686, 08-<br />

02-00896-a, and 09-02-66732, the <strong>JINR</strong>-Belorussian Grant (contract F08D-001) and RF<br />

Scientific School grant 1027.2008.2.<br />

<strong>References</strong><br />

[1] S.E. Kuhn, J.P. Chen and E. Leader, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 63 (2009) 1.<br />

100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!