24.12.2012 Views

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3 The conditions for transparent spin resonance<br />

crossing<br />

Taking into account the above conception one can get a complete compensation <strong>of</strong> depolarization<br />

degree at resonance crossing. The conditions for transparent crossing are<br />

given by<br />

J(λ−) =±J(λ+) . (4)<br />

where λ− and λ+ are λ values before (θ = θ−) andafter(θ = θ+) resonance crossing.<br />

Let us consider the simple example <strong>of</strong> circular accelerator with only one Fourier harmonic<br />

<strong>of</strong> the field � W due to vertical betatron oscillations for the purposes <strong>of</strong> illustration:<br />

where �e1(Ψz) =�ex cos Ψz+�ey sin Ψz, Ψz is the phase, νz =Ψ ′ z<br />

�W = ν0 �ez + w�e1(Ψz) (5)<br />

is the vertical betatron tune,<br />

�ex, �ey, �ez denote the corresponding radial, longitudinal and vertical orts <strong>of</strong> “accelerator”<br />

basis, ν0 = γG = γ(g − 2)/2 is spin tune in ideal accelerator at w =0.<br />

Thus, the “natural” spin basis is:<br />

�ℓ1 = − w ε<br />

�ez+<br />

h h �e1(Ψz)<br />

�<br />

, �ℓ2 = �n × � �<br />

ℓ1 = �ey cos Ψz−�ex sin Ψz , �n(Ψz) = ε w<br />

�ez+<br />

h h �e1(Ψz) ,<br />

here are h = √ ε 2 + w 2 , ε = ν0 − νz — spin detuning.<br />

The general spin tune ν is equal to h in this natural basis { � ℓ1, � ℓ2,�n}, near the isolated<br />

spin resonance.<br />

Ν<br />

Ν0�Νk<br />

Ν0�ΓG<br />

Figure 1: The general spin<br />

tune dependence vs tune ν0 (vs<br />

the energy)<br />

1<br />

�1<br />

� �<br />

n�e<br />

z<br />

Ν0�Νk<br />

Ν0<br />

Figure 2: The vertical component<br />

<strong>of</strong> precession axis plotted<br />

vs the tune ν0<br />

1<br />

�1<br />

� �<br />

n�e<br />

1<br />

Ν0�Νk<br />

Figure 3: The transverse component<br />

<strong>of</strong> precession axis plotted<br />

vs the tune ν0<br />

The dependencies <strong>of</strong> general spin tune as well as vertical and transverse �n axis projections<br />

on “energy” are shown in Fig. 1-3. The mirror-reflected decision {�n, ν} →{−�n, −ν}<br />

is shown by a dashed line.<br />

The variable λ coincide with the ν0 = γG value at the particles accelerations. The condition<br />

(3) can be fulfilled at any moment <strong>of</strong> adiabatic crossing if (ν − νk = h, w = const)<br />

|dν0/dθ| ≪w 2 . (6)<br />

The condition (6) can be violated for very small resonance strength (at w → 0 ). Spin<br />

action variable J(λ) can be changed only in the resonance region. The beam’s polarization<br />

is decrease in this case. The condition for transparent crossing is the restoration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

spin action variable value after spin resonance crossing.<br />

408<br />

Ν0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!