24.12.2012 Views

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

precession in a ”field” h = ɛ ez + w ey, whereɛ = ν0 − νd ± k is the resonance tune, see<br />

Fig. 1. The precession frequency h = √ ɛ 2 + w 2 in the resonance case (ɛ = 0) decays to<br />

wk, which can be taken as a strength <strong>of</strong> the resonance.<br />

The spin resonance crossing was described by Froissart-<br />

Stora [12], who found that in result <strong>of</strong> passing from ɛ = ∞<br />

up to ɛ = −∞ with a tune rate ˙ɛ = const the residual projectionaveragedoverspinphases<br />

Sz =(S · n0) is described<br />

by a formula:<br />

πw2<br />

−<br />

Sz = Sz(0)(2 e 2˙ɛ − 1). (5)<br />

The final result depends on the spin phase advance near the<br />

Figure 1: Resonant frame.<br />

resonance center: Ψ = � hdt∼ w2 /˙ɛ. The polarization is<br />

preserved by an adiabatic change <strong>of</strong> parameters (Ψ ≫ 1) and flips down together with<br />

the n = h/h -axis. In the opposite case <strong>of</strong> a fast crossing (Ψ ≪ 1), the spin only tilts<br />

slightly from its initial direction with a depolarization ΔSn � w2 /˙ɛ. Polarization losses<br />

may attain ∼ 100% in intermediate situations Δφ ≤ 1.<br />

At electron accelerators there are other limitations<br />

for RF-device usage. Quantum fluctuations <strong>of</strong> the synchrotron<br />

radiation lead to so called, ”spin diffusion”,<br />

which is enhanced at spin resonances. [4] In a general<br />

case, a quantum emission in the resonant frame brings at<br />

the same instant jumps <strong>of</strong> the resonance tune (δɛ), the<br />

resonant harmonic (δwk) and it’s phase (δφ), see Fig. 2.<br />

At that, the precession axis n = h/h gets a kick δn :<br />

(δn) 2 =(δ arctan( |wk|<br />

ɛ ))2 + w2 k<br />

h 2 (δφk) 2 , (6)<br />

τ −1<br />

d<br />

= 1<br />

2<br />

d<br />

dt<br />

Figure 2: Spin diffusion.<br />

but spin vector does not change (we neglect here ”spin-flip” quantum emissions). However,<br />

the projection Sn undergoes a change δSn = −1/2(δn) 2 Sn. A consequence <strong>of</strong> random<br />

kicks results in a polarization loss with a decay time τd =1/2 � d<br />

dt (δn)2� , where the angle<br />

brackets 〈〉 denote an average over time and an ensemble.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> the RF-resonance (δφ = 0), we assume the time <strong>of</strong> the resonance crossing<br />

Δt ∼ w/˙ɛ is much longer than the radiative damping time τ0 and the characteristic times<br />

<strong>of</strong> the orbital motion. Therefore we can consider, in average, numerous jumps <strong>of</strong> δɛ and δw<br />

only as a diffusion around mean values ɛ and w with corresponding rms deviations σν,<br />

and σw. So, from (6) we find the depolarization time, caused by the quantum fluctuations:<br />

� � � �<br />

2<br />

ɛδw − wδɛ<br />

w 2 + ɛ 2<br />

� ɛ 2 σ 2 w + w 2 σ 2 ν<br />

(w 2 + ɛ 2 ) 2<br />

· τ −1<br />

0 . (7)<br />

To obtain above expression, we ignored the interference term by the averaging over<br />

time ( δɛ · δw = 0) and used usual formulas for an equilibrium state: σ2 ɛ =1/2 � d<br />

dt (δɛ)2� ·<br />

τ0; σ2 w =1/2; � d<br />

dt (δw)2� · τ0 with σw from (4), where σ2 γ =1/2 � d<br />

dt (δγ)2� · τ0. At the<br />

next step we employ the FS-formula for electron machines, taking into account the spin<br />

diffusion under the condition <strong>of</strong> adiabatic crossing (ψ ≫ w2 ). We calculate the beam<br />

˙ɛ<br />

polarization ζ(t) = 〈Sn〉 = ζ(0) · � t<br />

0 e−t/τd dt, while resonance crossing with different<br />

433

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!