24.12.2012 Views

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

models have recently been challenged by the elastic form factors obtained at Jefferson Lab,<br />

resulting in an intense discussion <strong>of</strong> questions related to the shape <strong>of</strong> the proton [47, 48],<br />

and the contribution <strong>of</strong> the quark orbital angular momentum to its spin, for example see<br />

Ref. [41].<br />

The new data from the GEp-III experiment at higher Q 2 , although still preliminary,<br />

show a slowing decrease <strong>of</strong> G p<br />

E /Gp<br />

M with Q2 relative to the linear decrease observed in<br />

the Hall A data for Q 2 ≤ 5.6 GeV 2 . Although the statistical significance <strong>of</strong> this change<br />

in behavior is somewhat marginal, its physical implications are interesting to consider.<br />

A constant ratio G p<br />

E /Gp<br />

M at asymptotically large Q2 is a signature <strong>of</strong> the onset <strong>of</strong> the<br />

dimensional scaling expected from perturbative QCD for a nucleon consisting <strong>of</strong> three<br />

weakly interacting quarks.<br />

The final answer to the question <strong>of</strong> the origin <strong>of</strong> the discrepancy between the results<br />

from Rosenbluth separation and polarization transfer will have to come from experiments.<br />

There are several directly- and indirectly related experiments designed to provide answer<br />

to the question. For example, (1) the GEp-2γ experiment measured ɛ-dependence <strong>of</strong><br />

the GEp/GMp ratio at constant Q 2 , obtained from recoil polarization in Hall C [18].<br />

The preliminary results for the μpGEp/GMp ratio at Q 2 =2.49 GeV 2 , at the 3 values <strong>of</strong><br />

ɛ 0.14, 0.63 and 0.79, were shown in Fig. 6; no deviation from constancy is seen at<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> 0.01 absolute, showing that the recoil polarization results follow the Born<br />

approximation at this Q 2 . (2) Cross section difference in e + and e − proton scattering<br />

in Hall B [49] (also approved experiment OLYMPUS at DESY [50]) ; this difference is<br />

twice the contribution <strong>of</strong> a two-photon exchange; and (3) Measuring non-linearity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Rosenbluth plot; experiment E05-017 measured the cross sections with high precision at<br />

several Q 2 values as a function <strong>of</strong> ɛ to extract the ratio; data taking for this experiment<br />

was completed in July 2007 [51].<br />

The measurement <strong>of</strong> nucleon form factors to the highest possible Q 2 is one <strong>of</strong> the prime<br />

tenets <strong>of</strong> the JLab 12 GeV upgrade. Two new proposals, GEp-IV [52] and GEp-V [53],<br />

were submitted to JLab PAC 34 and 32, respectively to extend the proton form factor<br />

ratio measurements, when a 12 GeV beam becomes available. In Experiment GEp-V the<br />

ratio will be measured in Hall A to 14.8 GeV 2 , and in the GEp-IV experiment in Hall<br />

C, it will be measured to 13 GeV 2 . These planned experiments covering the Q 2 range<br />

from 10-15 GeV 2 following the 12 GeV upgrade <strong>of</strong> the CEBAF accelerator, will answer<br />

the question <strong>of</strong> whether the flattening hinted at by the GEp-III experimental results is<br />

continues to decrease and eventually cross zero.<br />

real or whether G p<br />

E /Gp<br />

M<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

The authors wish to thank the organizers <strong>of</strong> the Dubna Dspin-09 workshop for their<br />

invitation to present this paper. The authors are supported by grants from the NSF(USA),<br />

PHY0753777 (CFP), and DOE(USA), DE-FG02-89ER40525 (VP).<br />

<strong>References</strong><br />

[1] M.N. Rosenbluth, Phys. Rev. 79, 615 (1950).<br />

[2] M.K. Jones et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1398 (2000).<br />

310

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!