24.12.2012 Views

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This last is required to complete the description <strong>of</strong> transverse-spin effects, in both SSA’s<br />

and g2. The two correlators have opposite symmetry properties for x1 ↔ x2:<br />

bA(x1,x2) =bA(x2,x1), bV (x1,x2) =−bV (x2,x1), (20)<br />

determined by T invariance. In both DIS and SSA’s just one combination appears [19]:<br />

b−(x1,x2) =bA(x2,x1) − bV (x1,x2). (21)<br />

The QCD evolution equations [20–22] are best expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> another quantity,<br />

which is determined by matrix elements <strong>of</strong> the gluon field strength:<br />

Y (x1,x2) =(x1 − x2) b−(x1,x2). (22)<br />

It should be safe to assume that b−(x1,x2) has no double pole and thus<br />

T (x) =Y (x, x). (23)<br />

Evolution is easier studied for Mellin-moment, implying double moments <strong>of</strong> Y (x, y):<br />

Y mn �<br />

=<br />

dx dy x m y n Y (x, y), (24)<br />

where the allowed regions are |x|, |y| and |x − y| < 1 (recall that negative values indicate<br />

antiquark distributions). We wish to examine the behaviour for x and y both close to<br />

unity and therefore close to each other. The gluonic pole thus provides the dominant<br />

contribution:<br />

lim<br />

x,y→1<br />

x+y<br />

Y (x, y) =T ( )+O(x − y). (25)<br />

2<br />

In this approximation (now large m, n) the leading-order evolution equations simplify:<br />

d<br />

ds Y nn �<br />

=4 CF + CA<br />

�<br />

ln nY<br />

2<br />

nn , (26)<br />

where the evolution variable is s = β −1<br />

0 ln ln Q2 .Interms<strong>of</strong>T (x) thisis<br />

�<br />

T ˙ (x) =4 CF + CA<br />

� � 1<br />

(1 − z) 1<br />

dz T (z),<br />

2 (1 − x) (z − x)+<br />

(27)<br />

x<br />

which is similar to the unpolarised case, but differs by a colour factor (CF + CA/2) and a<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tening factor (1 − z)/(1 − x).<br />

The extra piece in the colour factor (CA/2) vis-a-vis the unpolarised case (just CF)<br />

reflects the presence <strong>of</strong> a third active parton—the gluon. That is, the pole structure <strong>of</strong><br />

three-parton kernels is identical, but the effective colour charge <strong>of</strong> the extra gluon is CA/2.<br />

The s<strong>of</strong>tening factor is inessential to the asymptotic solution, it merely implies standard<br />

evolution for the function f(x) =(1−x)T (x). For an initial f(x, Q2 0 )=(1−x)a ,the<br />

asymptotic solution [28] is the same but modified by a → a(s), with<br />

� �<br />

a(s) =a +4<br />

s. (28)<br />

CF + CA<br />

2<br />

For T (x), a shifts to a − 1 and the evolution modification is identical; the spin-averaged<br />

asymptotic solutions are thus also valid for T (x). This large-x limit <strong>of</strong> the evolution<br />

agrees, barring the colour factor itself, with studies <strong>of</strong> gluonic-pole evolution [23–25]. We<br />

should note here that Braun et al. [29] have found errors in [23] and [25]; our results for<br />

the logarithmic term are, however, unaffected.<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!