24.12.2012 Views

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Gj(y) are the unpolarized valon distributions, where j refers to U and D type valons<br />

[2]. The functions δFj(y) are given in [3]. δqvalon i (z = x/y, Q2 ) is the polarized parton<br />

distribution in the valon . Polarized parton distributions inside the valon are evaluated<br />

according to the DGLAP evolution equation subject to physically sensible initial conditions<br />

[3]. In the valon model the hadron structure is obtained by the convolution <strong>of</strong> valon<br />

structure and its distribution inside the hadron. Having specified the various components<br />

that contribute to the spin <strong>of</strong> a valon, we now turn to the polarized hadron structure,<br />

which is obtained by a convolution integral as follows:<br />

g h 1 (x, Q2 )= �<br />

� 1<br />

dy<br />

y δGhvalon (y)gvalon 1 ( x<br />

y ,Q2 ). (3)<br />

valon<br />

x<br />

The valon structure is generated by perturbative dressing in QCD. In such processes<br />

with massless quarks, helicity is conserved and therefore, the hard gluons can not induce<br />

sea quark polarization perturbatively. According to this description, it turns out that<br />

sea polarization is consistent with zero [3, 4]. This finding is supported by HERMES<br />

experiment and by the newly released data from COMPASS experiment [5–7].<br />

There is an excellent agreement between the model predictions with the experimental<br />

data for spin structure functions. A sample is given in Figure 1.<br />

2 Axial coupling constants: a3 and a8<br />

The axial coupling constant can be write as a combination <strong>of</strong> PPDFs as follows:<br />

g 3 A ≡ s μ =Δu(Q 2 ) − Δd(Q 2 ),<br />

g 8 A ≡ s μ =Δu(Q 2 )+Δd(Q 2 ) − 2Δs(Q 2 ).<br />

In the model described in the section 1, we showed that [3, 4], the calculations in the<br />

framework <strong>of</strong> NLO perturbation theory, shows that the sea quark contribution to the spin<br />

<strong>of</strong> proton is essentially consistent with zero, then we have:<br />

xg1p<br />

0.08<br />

0.07<br />

0.06<br />

0.05<br />

0.04<br />

0.03<br />

0.02<br />

0.01<br />

0<br />

10 -4<br />

SLAC-E143<br />

SMC-low x<br />

HERMES<br />

AAC<br />

BB<br />

GRSV<br />

MODEL<br />

10 -3<br />

10 -2<br />

x<br />

10 -1<br />

10 0<br />

0.03<br />

0.02<br />

0.01<br />

0<br />

-0.01<br />

10 -3<br />

COMPASS Q2>1 (Gev2)<br />

COMPASS Q2>0.7 (Gev2)<br />

SMC<br />

HERMES<br />

AAC<br />

BB<br />

GRSV<br />

MODEL<br />

Figure 1: Left: Polarized proton structure function, xg p<br />

1 at Q2 =5GeV 2 . Right: Polarized deuteron<br />

structure function, xg d 1 at Q 2 =3GeV 2 . The results from model compared with the global fits [9–11]<br />

and the experimental data [5, 7, 12–14]<br />

144<br />

xg1d<br />

10 -2<br />

x<br />

10 -1<br />

10 0<br />

(4)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!