24.12.2012 Views

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NLO Phase Space is simulated correctly especially for hard gluon emissions which are<br />

not properly treated in the PS concept. On the other hand hard emissions <strong>of</strong> the real<br />

gluons should not be important because the probability <strong>of</strong> such process is rather small.<br />

The comparison <strong>of</strong> these two approaches is discussed in the next section. The weighted<br />

MC approach cannot be used in the COMPASS analysis scheme because the acceptance<br />

corrections and detector performance cannot be simulated in such a simple MC generator.<br />

As it will be seen in the next section the results obtained with AROMA generator and<br />

PS and using weighted MC approach are very similar what justify the method based on<br />

PS concept.<br />

4 Predictions for the gluon polarization in NLO QCD<br />

approximation for PGF process<br />

The gluon polarization predictions presented in this paper are estimated from the published<br />

asymmetries by COMPASS Collaboration. To calculate aLL - only pure MC generator<br />

without apparatus simulation was used. Hence the statistical error is slightly<br />

underestimated. Asymmetries published in [2] are weighted by the weight composed <strong>of</strong><br />

depolarization factor and signal strength (S/(S + B)) In the calculations presented here<br />

signal strength is assumed to be one because MC reproduces only signal (open charm<br />

events are generated). In the weighted MC approach the Peterson fragmentation function<br />

fitted to data from BELLE Collaboration was used [11] while for AROMA generation<br />

JETSET was applied. Three different models <strong>of</strong> gluon polarization, ΔG/G, wereused<br />

(in the cese where partonic CMS energy is defined by final charm quark pair system):<br />

ΔG/G = const and two solutions from COMPASS QCD fits analysis, published in [12].<br />

For an unpolarized gluons MRST 2004 PDF set was used.<br />

To validate the method the gluon polarization in the LO QCD approximation (AROMA<br />

MC generator with PS switched <strong>of</strong>f) and using the published asymmetries was found:<br />

ΔG/G = −0.47 ± 0.23. The good agreement between fully weighted COMPASS published<br />

result: ΔG/G = −0.49 ± 0.27, where acceptance and apparatus simulation have<br />

been taken into account justifies also COMPASS binning used for presenting D 0 asymmetries.<br />

The gluon polarization results obtained in the NLO QCD approximation for the gluon<br />

polarization model independent case is: ΔG/G =0.032 ± 0.23 and should be compared<br />

with the weighted MC result ΔG/G =0.005 ± 0.22. The good agreement is seen what<br />

justifies the approach based on PS concept to simulate NLO QCD real emissions. Finally<br />

the gluon polarization results for three considered models <strong>of</strong> gluon polarizations (for the<br />

case where partonic CMS is defined by charm quark system) are: −0.051 ± 0.24 for<br />

ΔG/G =const,−0.036 ± 0.24 for ΔG/G > 0and−0.057 ± 0.24 for ΔG/G < 0 solutions<br />

<strong>of</strong> COMPASS QCD fits, respectively. In the light <strong>of</strong> these results the inconsistency related<br />

to definition <strong>of</strong> partonic CMS energy, discussed in the previous section, is not important.<br />

5 Conclusions<br />

The predictions for gluon polarization based on recently measured asymmetries for opencharm<br />

muoproduction by COMPASS Collaboration are presented. The results are ob-<br />

233

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!