24.12.2012 Views

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3 Exclusive DVCS Events<br />

The HERMES experiment [3] exploited longitudinally polarized 27.6 GeV electron or<br />

positron beam at HERA storage ring at DESY together with longitudinally or transversely<br />

polarized or unpolarized gas targets (H, D or heavier nuclei). Exclusive events were<br />

selected requiring the detection <strong>of</strong> the scattered lepton and one photon. In addition,<br />

as the recoiling proton has not been detected, the calculated missing mass was required<br />

to match the proton mass within the resolution <strong>of</strong> the spectrometer, which defines the<br />

“exclusive region”, see Fig. 1b.<br />

Without the detection <strong>of</strong> the recoil proton it is not possible to separate the elastic<br />

DVCS and BH events from the “associated” process, where the nucleon in the final state<br />

is excited to a resonant state. Within the exclusive region, its contribution is estimated<br />

from Monte Carlo simulation to be about 12 %, which is taken as part <strong>of</strong> signal. The main<br />

background contribution <strong>of</strong> about 3% is originating from semi-inclusive π 0 production and<br />

is corrected for. The contribution from exclusive π 0 production is estimated to be less<br />

than 0.5%. The systematic uncertainties are obtained from a Monte Carlo simulation<br />

estimating the effects <strong>of</strong> limited acceptance, smearing, finite bin width and alignment <strong>of</strong><br />

the detectors with respect to the beam. Other sources are background contributions and<br />

a shift <strong>of</strong> the position <strong>of</strong> the exclusive missing mass peak between the data taken with<br />

different beam charges.<br />

4 Beam-Charge and Beam-Spin Asymmetries<br />

In Figs. 1 and 2 results obtained on the hydrogen target are shown [4]. The first four<br />

rows <strong>of</strong> Fig. 1 represent different cosine amplitudes <strong>of</strong> the BCA, whereas the last row<br />

shows the fractional contributions <strong>of</strong> the associated BH process. In the first column the<br />

integrated result is shown, in the other columns the amplitudes are binned in −t, xB and<br />

Q2 variables. The error bars show the statistical and the bands represent the systematic<br />

uncertainties. The magnitudes <strong>of</strong> the first two cosine moments A<br />

cos 0φ<br />

C<br />

and A<br />

cos φ<br />

C<br />

increase<br />

with increasing −t, while having opposite signs, they are in agreement with theoretical<br />

calculations. At HERMES kinematic conditions, both mainly relate to the Compton<br />

Form Factor (CFF) which is a convolution <strong>of</strong> GPD function H with the hard scattering<br />

amplitude [4]. The constant term there is suppressed relative to the first moment. The<br />

second cosine moment appears in twist-3 approximation and is found to be compatible<br />

with zero like the third cosine moment, which is related to gluonic GPDs. Fraction <strong>of</strong><br />

“associated” production is presented in the fifth raw for each kinematic point.<br />

The first sine moment A<br />

sin φ<br />

LU,I<br />

is large and negative in HERMES kinematic conditions,<br />

see Fig. 2. This amplitude relates to the imaginary part <strong>of</strong> the CFF. The results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

GPD model calculations [5,6] based on the framework <strong>of</strong> double distributions [7] are also<br />

shown there. The model includes a Regge-inspired t-ansatz and a factorized t-ansatz with<br />

the calculation <strong>of</strong> the contribution <strong>of</strong> D-term [6]. We note, that the calculations performed<br />

without the contribution <strong>of</strong> D-term describe well HERMES results on BCA, see Fig. 2.<br />

Both BSA model calculations fail to describe the data except for small −t.<br />

Results obtained on the deuteron target (not shown) are compatible with the data<br />

on a proton for almost all amplitudes in the same kinematic bins [8]. The nuclear-mass<br />

dependence <strong>of</strong> beam-helicity azimuthal asymmetries has been measured for targets rang-<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!