24.12.2012 Views

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

cos 0φ<br />

C<br />

A<br />

φ<br />

cos<br />

C<br />

A<br />

cos 2φ<br />

C<br />

A<br />

cos 3φ<br />

C<br />

A<br />

Res. frac<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

−0.2<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

−0.1<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

−0.1<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

overall<br />

2<br />

0<br />

.2<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1<br />

0<br />

.1<br />

1<br />

0<br />

.1<br />

4<br />

.3<br />

.2<br />

.1<br />

HERMES PRELIMINARY 2 VGG Regge, D<br />

±<br />

± e + p → e + p + γ<br />

Accep & smear → sys error<br />

VGG Regge, no D<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6<br />

0<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6<br />

2<br />

−t[GeV ]<br />

0<br />

.2<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1<br />

.1<br />

1<br />

4<br />

.1<br />

3<br />

2<br />

.1<br />

0<br />

0.1 0.2 0.3<br />

0.1 0.2 0.3<br />

0.1 0.2 0.3<br />

0.1 0.2 0.3<br />

2<br />

0<br />

.2<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1<br />

.1<br />

1<br />

.1<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

.1<br />

0<br />

xB<br />

2 4 6 8 10<br />

2 4 6 8 10<br />

2 4 6 8 10<br />

2 4 6 8 10<br />

2 2<br />

Q [GeV ]<br />

Figure 2: The amplitudes <strong>of</strong> the beam-charge asymmetry extracted from hydrogen data (red squares) [4].<br />

The error bars (bands) represent the statistical (systematic) uncertainties. The curves are predictions <strong>of</strong><br />

a double-distribution GPD model [5, 6].<br />

ing from hydrogen to xenon [9]. For hydrogen, krypton and xenon, data were taken with<br />

both beam charges. For both DVCS and BH, coherent scattering occurs at small values <strong>of</strong><br />

−t and rapidly diminished with increasing |t|. Coherent and incoherent-enriched samples<br />

are selected according to a −t threshold that is chosen to vary with the target such that<br />

for each sample approximately the same kinematic conditions are obtained for all target<br />

gases. The nuclear-mass dependence <strong>of</strong> the BCA and BSA is presented separately for the<br />

coherent and incoherent-enriched samples in Fig. 4 on the left and right panels, respectively.<br />

The cos φ amplitude <strong>of</strong> the BCA is consistent with zero for the coherent-enriched<br />

samples for all three targets, while it is about 0.1 for the incoherent-enriched samples.<br />

The sin φ amplitude <strong>of</strong> the beam-helicity asymmetry shown in Fig. 4 (right) has values<br />

<strong>of</strong> about −0.2 for both the coherent and incoherent-enriched samples. No nuclear-mass<br />

dependence <strong>of</strong> the BCA and BSA asymmetries is observed within experimental uncertainties.<br />

This is in agreement with models that approximate nuclear GPDs by nucleon GPDs<br />

neglecting bound state effects. The data do not support the enhancement <strong>of</strong> nuclear<br />

asymmetries compared to the free proton asymmetries for coherent scattering in spin-0<br />

and spin- 1<br />

2<br />

nuclei as anticipated by various models [10–12]. They also contradict the pre-<br />

dicted strong A dependence <strong>of</strong> the beam-charge asymmetry resulting from a contribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> meson exchange between nucleons to the scattering amplitude [12].<br />

182

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!