24.12.2012 Views

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 Results <strong>of</strong> GEp-III Experiment<br />

In Fig. 5 we show the preliminary results for the GEp-III experiment. Because GEp-III<br />

is the first recoil polarization experiment to use a completely different apparatus in a<br />

Q 2 range where direct comparison with the Hall A recoil polarization results is possible,<br />

it provides an important test <strong>of</strong> the reproducibility <strong>of</strong> the recoil polarization technique.<br />

Figure 5 shows the results <strong>of</strong> GEp-III experiment (filled triangles) together with the results<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Hall A experiments [2,3] (filled circles) and [4] (filled squares). The error bars shown<br />

are statistical only. The overlap point at 5.2 GeV 2 is in reasonably good agreement with<br />

the two surrounding points from [4], and confirms the continuing decrease <strong>of</strong> G p<br />

E /Gp<br />

M with<br />

Q 2 . The two new data points extend the knowledge <strong>of</strong> G p<br />

E /Gp<br />

M to yet higher Q2 .<br />

Additionally, the preliminary results <strong>of</strong> the high-statistics survey <strong>of</strong> the ɛ-dependence<br />

<strong>of</strong> G p<br />

E /Gp<br />

M at Q2 =2.5 GeV 2 ,GEp-2γ experiment, also shown as black triangle in Fig. 5<br />

is in excellent agreement with the Hall A results [3] at Q 2 =2.47 GeV 2 .SincetheGEp-2γ<br />

experiment was performed with identical apparatus and the data were analyzed in exactly<br />

the same way as in the GEp-III experiment, a systematic error in the analysis is all but<br />

ruled out.<br />

The interesting feature <strong>of</strong> the results is that the linearly decreasing trend observed<br />

in the previous data appears to be slowing in the Hall C data. Although the ratios still<br />

decreases with Q 2 , all <strong>of</strong> the new data points come in higher than the linear fit to the<br />

Hall A data.<br />

Figure 5: Results <strong>of</strong> GEp-III experiment (filled triangles) shown as μpG p<br />

E /Gp M . The results <strong>of</strong> experiments<br />

GEp-I (filled circles) and GEp-II (filled squares) and the Rosenbluth separation data (empty<br />

triangles) are shown for comparison. The error bars on the data points are statistical only.<br />

304

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!