24.12.2012 Views

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

References - Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics - JINR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Squeezing <strong>of</strong> quadrupole spectra.<br />

The electric field gradients and isotopic composition have to identify any blood sample<br />

for a noninvasive early cancer detection. In fact, at low temperatures any molecular<br />

movements are stopped and the electrical interactions reveal themselves only over the<br />

electric field gradients determined by the specific broadening <strong>of</strong> the spectral line shape.<br />

Magnetic interactions and, as we have seen, the isotopic composition are also withdrawn<br />

from the spectral analysis. In general they would have been understood as the complete set<br />

<strong>of</strong> parameters for the blood control for the early cancer detection, if the signal amplitudes<br />

did not reduce so much due to the quadrupole broadening <strong>of</strong> their spectra (see Fig. 1c).<br />

This broadening comes from random angle (θ) orientations <strong>of</strong> the electric field gradients<br />

relatively to the magnetic field direction. The eigen-states <strong>of</strong> 14 N spins in NH3 are [6]<br />

En = −hνcmn + hνQ{3cos 2 (θ) − 1}{3(mn) 2 − I(I +1)} , (2)<br />

where νc is the nitrogen Larmor frequency, eq is the quadrupole moment, νQ =(e 2 qQ/h)/8<br />

and eQ is an electric field gradient value, mn=(+1, 0, -1) and mp=(+1/2,-1/2) are the<br />

nitrogen and proton (see below) magnetic quantum numbers.<br />

The problem can be solved if the wave function <strong>of</strong> free electrons couples the nuclear<br />

spins situated nearby to F-centers with scalar Fermi interaction [7]. In this case the<br />

removed and nearest spins have energies Ed and EF , correspondingly:<br />

Ed = −hγp(H0 + Hloc)mp, EF = −hγpH0mp + hJ · mnmp . (3)<br />

The first <strong>of</strong> Eq.(3) describes the energy <strong>of</strong> remote spins situated far away from F-centres.<br />

Their Larmor frequency equals to ν0=γpH0 and it is shifted by local field (Hloc) <strong>of</strong> polarized<br />

protons to ν+ or ν− depending on the sign <strong>of</strong> Hloc (see the left and middle-hand diagrams<br />

in Fig. 2a). The second Eq.(3) approximately describes the energy <strong>of</strong> the nearest spins<br />

(the right-hand diagram in Fig. 2a). These protons are coupled with 14 N spins by the<br />

Fermi indirect interaction. J-constant <strong>of</strong> the Fermi interaction is determined by the<br />

density <strong>of</strong> the electron wave function inside nuclei [8]. The total effect from heterogeneous<br />

magnetization is demonstrated in Fig. 2b [5] which shows the proton NMR signals in<br />

(a) (b) (c)<br />

Figure 2a. (mp,mn)-sublevels in NH3: ν0-Larmor proton frequency, ν+, ν− are the same<br />

frequency at opposite signs <strong>of</strong> polarizations, νJ+, νJ0 and νJ−-are J-coupling transitions.<br />

Figure 2b. Proton NMR line shapes for different values <strong>of</strong> polarizations.<br />

Figure 2c. Proton lines in NH3 centred at the tops. They are subdivided into the symmetrical<br />

dipolar part and asymmetrical fractions owing to J-coupling between H3 and N spins.<br />

403

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!