30.12.2012 Views

This Page Intentionally Left Blank - Int Medical

This Page Intentionally Left Blank - Int Medical

This Page Intentionally Left Blank - Int Medical

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

140 Burns<br />

for moderate-to-severe burn-associated pain. The IV route for opioid anal-<br />

gesics is preferred over PO administration because of the rapidity and consistency<br />

of absorption and onset. <strong>This</strong> makes titration to an effective dose<br />

easier, but care must be taken to provide dosing with appropriate frequency<br />

to maintain the analgesic effect (a particular issue if fentanyl is used). The<br />

fact that control of burn pain often requires relatively higher doses of opioid<br />

analgesia may be in part related to changes in volume of distribution, protein<br />

binding, and clearance. 15<br />

For some opioids, other sites of rapid absorption may also be utilized.<br />

For example, IN fentanyl has been favorably compared to PO and IV opioids<br />

for control of procedural pain in burn patients. A small double-blind RCT<br />

suggested that IN fentanyl (1.4 μg/kg) was as effective as PO morphine<br />

(1 mg/kg) in reducing the pain of dressing changes in 24 children with<br />

burns. 16 Similar results were reported in a study of 26 adult burn patients<br />

treated with IN fentanyl (1.48 μg/kg) or PO morphine (0.35 mg/kg). 17<br />

Preliminary assessment of the use of topical morphine for burn analgesia<br />

had disappointing results. 18<br />

A small pilot study of 10 patients suggested that the analgesic qualities of<br />

oral controlled-release morphine were comparable to those of continuous IV<br />

morphine sulfate infusions. 19<br />

In addition to the general risk of respiratory depression with opioids, their<br />

use in patients with burns may have some association with the immune<br />

suppression frequently seen in severely burned patients. However, evidence<br />

on this subject is conflicting. 20,21<br />

<strong>Int</strong>ravenous infusion of lidocaine (1 mg/kg bolus followed by 2–4 mg/min<br />

infusion) and other local anesthetics has also been investigated with some<br />

promising results. 22–26 Although timely provision of regional nerve blocks<br />

may not be feasible in many ED settings, this approach can provide exceptional<br />

relief of burn pain.<br />

Topical application of local anesthetics or opioids may have salutary<br />

effects on local physiology, but this approach has not otherwise been successful,<br />

and it is not recommended for pain management. 27<br />

Anxiolytics, particularly benzodiazepines, have been shown to be useful<br />

adjuncts to pain therapy in burns. Care must be exercised in administering

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!