30.12.2012 Views

This Page Intentionally Left Blank - Int Medical

This Page Intentionally Left Blank - Int Medical

This Page Intentionally Left Blank - Int Medical

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

264 Neck and back pain – mechanical strain<br />

extrapolated from their effectiveness in managing the closely related syndrome<br />

of refractory back pain. 5<br />

Muscle relaxants are often prescribed for sprains and strains of the neck<br />

and back. Although agents in this class have sedative properties, they provide<br />

no direct skeletal muscle relaxation at the doses commonly used for MSSP. 6<br />

In fact, the sedative effects of skeletal muscle relaxants are probably responsible<br />

for their efficacy (compared with placebo) as monotherapy for improving<br />

MSSP pain. 7,8 Clinicians who use muscle relaxants to treat MSSP should<br />

be aware that the likely mediator of symptom relief is not muscular at all, but<br />

rather the drugs’ sedative actions.<br />

Despite anecdotal suggestions of efficacy, and prevalent use in everyday<br />

acute care practice, the dual-therapy approach combining muscle relaxants<br />

and NSAIDs lacks robust evidentiary support. If widely held beliefs in this<br />

regimen’s utility are indeed accurate, efficacy could be a placebo effect or a<br />

salutary combination of sedation with analgesia. There are no RCT data<br />

finding benefit of dual therapy over single-agent use of either NSAIDs or<br />

muscle relaxants. 9,10<br />

Commonly used muscle relaxants include cyclobenzaprine (5–10 mg<br />

PO TID), orphenadrine (100 mg PO BID), metaxolone (800 mg PO<br />

TID–QID), methocarbamol (1000 mg PO QID), carisoprodol (350 mg PO<br />

TID–QID), and chlorzoxazone (250–500 mg PO TID–QID). While there are<br />

no data comparing effectiveness of muscle relaxants for MSSP, these agents<br />

differ with respect to chemical class, pharmacology, and relative propensity<br />

to cause certain adverse effects. 11 For example, cyclobenzaprine and orphenadrine<br />

are associated with anticholinergic side effects; chlorzoxazone<br />

(rarely) causes hepatic toxicity, and carisoprodol has abuse potential. 12,13 As<br />

one of the more commonly prescribed skeletal muscle relaxants, cyclobenzaprine<br />

has the advantage of familiarity and is probably as good as any other<br />

muscle relaxant; its sedative effects can be minimized by using a lower dose<br />

(5 mg PO TID). 3<br />

Potential for side effects (e.g. sedation) and lack of evidence of improved<br />

pain relief over that attained with NSAID monotherapy relegates muscle<br />

relaxants to second-line use. These agents are recommended only for<br />

patients in whom they have been effective in the past, or in those who fail

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!