05.01.2013 Views

Music Therapy Today - World Federation of Music Therapy

Music Therapy Today - World Federation of Music Therapy

Music Therapy Today - World Federation of Music Therapy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fachner, J. (2006) ‘Set and setting’ in an electrophysiological research paradigm on music perception under the influence <strong>of</strong> cannabis<br />

and correlated brain function. <strong>Music</strong> <strong>Therapy</strong> <strong>Today</strong> (Online) Vol.VII (2) 333-374. available at http://musictherapyworld.net<br />

PARIETAL AND<br />

TEMPORAL EEG<br />

CHANGES<br />

avoid laboratory bias. Artifact control was done visually by a time-coded<br />

video protocol. After removing potential artifact maps, (fronto-polar δ<br />

threshold at 105 µV on 256 µV DR) Individual (IA) and Group Averages<br />

(GA) were processed using the statistics s<strong>of</strong>tware package <strong>of</strong> the Neuro-<br />

Science BrainImager®. More details <strong>of</strong> data editing can be found in<br />

Fachner (2001, 2002b).<br />

Pre/post rest and pre/post music listening results were averaged and sub-<br />

jected to a t-Test. Therefore each piece <strong>of</strong> music and one minute <strong>of</strong><br />

silence before the music was recorded and individually averaged, subse-<br />

quently. The investigation included one extended single case study with a<br />

follow-up. Research focus for each person was on individual drug and<br />

music reactions by comparing the pre/post individual averages (IndAvg)<br />

and the total group average (Gavg) <strong>of</strong> the pre/post rest and music sessions<br />

over the sample. Amplitude mapping does not provide dynamical<br />

changes <strong>of</strong> the music but represents average electrophysiological activity<br />

while listening as reflected in the maps. Furthermore, we are able to<br />

name areas <strong>of</strong> difference in the pre- and post- conditions.<br />

Results and discussion<br />

The colored brain maps and results are published and discussed else-<br />

where (Fachner, 2001; Fachner, 2002b; Fachner et al., 2001). I would<br />

like to summarize and discuss some <strong>of</strong> the results.<br />

Cannabis intensifies processes <strong>of</strong> sensory perception, and – like almost<br />

all psychedelic drugs – seems to hamper access to the upper brain regions<br />

(Cytowic, 1993). This is what follows from the literature on EEG and<br />

cannabis (Fachner, 2001; Fink et al., 1976; Struve & Straumanis, 1990)<br />

and from this pre/post comparison <strong>of</strong> the data. While listening to music<br />

without cannabis, higher amplitudes and frequencies were found over<br />

Results and discussion 350

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!