09.01.2013 Views

FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army

FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army

FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ENGINEERS<br />

Stability and Civil Support Operations<br />

� Understanding the potential for grave consequences originating from Soldier and small-unit<br />

actions.<br />

� Acting decisively to prevent the escalation of violence.<br />

7-8. In stability operations, most engineer effort is focused on theater infrastructure repair and restoration<br />

to reconstruct or establish services that support the population. Given the nature of stability operations, the<br />

risks associated with environmental hazards may have a greater importance and impact in stability<br />

operations than in offensive or defensive operations. Stability operations tend to be long compared to<br />

offensive, defensive, and civil support operations. As such, the level of engineer effort is very high at the<br />

onset and gradually decreases as the theater matures and support requirements transfer to civilian<br />

contractors, such as those who operate under the logistics civilian augmentation program (LOGCAP).<br />

7-9. Within the BCT, the missions performed by organic and augmenting engineer forces in stability<br />

operations are linked directly to the BCT mission and responsibility. While combat engineer route<br />

clearance and other close support capabilities may be critical tasks applied through the movement and<br />

maneuver warfighting function, a larger portion of engineer requirements within the BCT AO are likely<br />

met with general engineering and other specialized engineer capabilities. The BCT ENCOORD must be<br />

prepared to coordinate the simultaneous execution of these engineer capabilities throughout the depth of<br />

the BCT AO and in synchronization with warfighting functions. When the required engineer augmentation<br />

is unavailable to the BCT, the ENCOORD must rely on contracted engineering support, reachback, or<br />

collaborative planning with another engineer element for the necessary technical support to enhance BCT<br />

organic engineer capabilities. (The integration of engineer operations into stability operations is discussed<br />

later in this chapter.)<br />

7-10. In analyzing engineer requirements in stability operations and determining BCT essential tasks for<br />

M/CM/S, the ENCOORD considers the following factors:<br />

� Terrain in the AO.<br />

� Type of obstacles in the AO.<br />

� Engineer assets and available capabilities.<br />

� Operation duration.<br />

� Water supply and location.<br />

� Sewage and garbage facilities.<br />

� Local power facilities.<br />

� Firefighting capability.<br />

� Base support requirements.<br />

� Demining center issues.<br />

� Basic country infrastructure (road, bridge, rail, airfield, port capability) and contracted<br />

engineering support.<br />

TYPES<br />

7-11. Stability operations typically fall into ten broad types that are neither discrete nor mutually exclusive.<br />

For example, a force engaged in a peace operation may also find itself conducting arms control or a show<br />

of force to set the conditions for achieving an end state. This section provides an introductory discussion of<br />

the types of stability operations. (For more detailed information, see <strong>FM</strong> 3-0 and <strong>FM</strong> 3-07.)<br />

7-12. The ten types of stability operations are—<br />

� Peace operations.<br />

� Peacekeeping.<br />

� Peace building.<br />

11 February 2009 <strong>FM</strong> 3-<strong>34.22</strong> 7-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!