FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army
FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army
FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 6<br />
6-102. Engineer involvement in combined arms planning for a retrograde operation is critical. The level<br />
of detail developed by the staff and the ENCOORD affects resourcing, task organization, and execution.<br />
Because of the tempo required during the operation, all contingencies must be addressed, war-gamed,<br />
prioritized, and resourced before execution. The tactical situation does not normally facilitate any<br />
significant changes to a plan once the operation is underway. Engineer involvement is of special<br />
importance during the IPB process. Input into the MCOO highlights the terrain effects on the attacking<br />
enemy. Once determined, this product of the terrain analysis impacts the—<br />
� Obstacle positions.<br />
� Required lane locations.<br />
� Decision point positions (to cause lane closure or the execution of situational and reserve<br />
obstacles).<br />
� Counterattack planning.<br />
6-103. The ENCOORD coordinates with the S-2 on engineer-specific IR. The IR are aimed at facilitating<br />
and maximizing the efforts of engineers supporting units conducting the counterreconnaissance fight and<br />
retrograde operation. Considerations include predicting enemy reconnaissance efforts on the SITEMP and<br />
main-body attack routes into the AO. These considerations aid in planning and executing obstacle belts and<br />
groups that support the retrograde operation.<br />
6-104. The identification of routes that the force uses is vital to all retrograde operations. Mobility must<br />
be maintained along these routes. While conducting terrain analysis during the IPB process, the<br />
ENCOORD works closely with the S-2 to determine feasible routes. Once this planning is complete, the<br />
routes are coordinated with the S-3 and the commander to determine which routes are required to meet<br />
operational requirements. With these routes identified, route reconnaissance can be conducted to verify<br />
their trafficability and suitability for the force. Information gained on the reconnaissance is critical during<br />
COA development and analysis. Route selection also affects countermobility planning and execution. Once<br />
the routes are finalized, engineer unit commanders ensure that they are upgraded and maintained as<br />
directed. LOC maintenance typically requires EAB augmentation. Lanes through friendly obstacles must<br />
be established and marked. Every Soldier in the unit must clearly understand the unit lane-marking system.<br />
Guides are frequently left at obstacle lane locations to ensure safe passage. Because of the critical nature of<br />
the mission, commanders must assume the responsibility of providing guides if the mission variables allow.<br />
6-105. A major component in countermobility planning and execution during a retrograde operation is the<br />
synchronization of the warfighting functions. Countermobility missions can only be executed with a clear<br />
understanding of the commander’s intent and concept of the operation. Situational obstacles are a key<br />
combat multiplier to the commander. Situational obstacles, like other engineer operations in retrograde<br />
operations, are normally centrally controlled.<br />
6-106. The maneuver unit may only have limited assets to use for survivability, given the critical<br />
requirements for mobility and countermobility. The survivability that is provided typically focuses on<br />
supporting the protection of key C2 and other critical systems. Selected fighting positions may also be<br />
developed to support key EAs supporting the retrograde. Existing fighting positions that support the<br />
scheme of maneuver of the withdrawal may also be used, but most survivability depends on the effective<br />
use of terrain and other measures (CCD).<br />
6-107. C2 of lane closure is vital to retrograde operations. Normally, lane closure is centrally planned and<br />
executed by the BCT to ensure that mission execution conforms to the commander’s intent and the scheme<br />
of maneuver. Frequently, obstacles identified for closing lanes become brigade reserve obstacles. Lane<br />
closure depends on—<br />
� Enemy and friendly activities.<br />
� Level of contact.<br />
� Size of the force left in contact.<br />
� Engineer forces available.<br />
� Time available.<br />
6-22 <strong>FM</strong> 3-<strong>34.22</strong> 11 February 2009