FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army
FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army
FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 2<br />
Integration of Engineer Operations<br />
The instruments of battle are valuable only if one knows how to use them.<br />
—Colonel Ardant du Picq<br />
Engineers are challenged when trying to execute engineering tasks in today’s OE.<br />
Force modularity, the application of engineer force tailoring, and limited engineer<br />
resources require flexible task organization and the ability of engineers to rapidly<br />
transition within the AO to meet mission requirements. Commanders and planners<br />
must understand this setting and the inherent C2 challenges they face in integrating<br />
engineer operations. This chapter centers on engineer participation in the supported<br />
BCT commander’s C2 and applies to organic and augmenting engineer unit<br />
commanders and planners. This chapter discusses planning (which is part of C2) and<br />
provides considerations for engineers as integrated members of the combined arms<br />
team. The construct and format for essential tasks for M/CM/S and the engineer staff<br />
running estimate are highlighted to assist engineer planners in integrating engineer<br />
operations. Finally, this chapter provides an overview of integrating processes and<br />
continuing activities and their contribution to the overall operations process.<br />
COMMAND AND CONTROL<br />
2-1. Limited engineer resources are a predominant factor in the OE. Careful prioritization and allocation<br />
of resources must occur to accomplish objectives. Because engineer assets are mission-tailored and<br />
allocated against specific requirements, engineers must be able to rapidly transition between phases of the<br />
operation and shifted throughout the AO to meet mission requirements. Effective C2 of engineer units is<br />
paramount.<br />
2-2. <strong>FM</strong> 6-0 provides <strong>Army</strong> doctrine for C2 and are interrelated. Command resides with commanders; it<br />
consists of authority, decisionmaking, and leadership. Control is how commanders execute command; it<br />
resides with both commanders and staffs. Commanders cannot exercise command effectively without<br />
control. Conversely, control has no purpose without command to focus it.<br />
2-3. In the past, engineer commanders supporting combined arms operations were always confronted<br />
with the dichotomy of exercising C2 responsibilities over their units, while fulfilling their role in<br />
supporting the maneuver commander’s C2 of the unit. Engineer leaders today are more challenged in<br />
ensuring effective C2 of engineer units given the requisite task organization of engineer forces (organic<br />
and augmenting) within the construct of the modular <strong>Army</strong>. Engineer unit commanders and planners must<br />
work together to ensure the effective control of engineer operations to facilitate their complete integration<br />
into combined arms operations. Command and support relationships are the basis for building task<br />
organization and provide the basis for ensuring the unity of command and unity of effort in operations.<br />
(See <strong>FM</strong> 3-0 for more information on command and support relationships.)<br />
COMMAND AND SUPPORT RELATIONSHIPS<br />
2-4. Additional engineer units augmenting the BCT are task-organized to the BCT in a command or<br />
support relationship, depending on the mission requirements. Those units and engineer units organic to the<br />
BCT may also be task-organized to a maneuver TF or the reconnaissance squadron (RS) or be subordinate<br />
to a company or troop. Command relationships prescribe the supporting engineer unit chain of command<br />
11 February 2009 <strong>FM</strong> 3-<strong>34.22</strong> 2-1