FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army
FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army
FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Appendix F<br />
anticipated enemy mission (attack or defend) and consider how enemy engineers are doctrinally employed.<br />
The ENCOORD then develops an estimate of enemy engineer capabilities. To do this, the ENCOORD uses<br />
the S-2 order of battle and knowledge of enemy engineer forces and other assets (combat vehicle<br />
reconnaissance effort or self-entrenching capabilities) that may impact engineer operations. The<br />
ENCOORD must also consider intelligence pertaining to recent enemy engineer activity or TTP.<br />
F-12. The ENCOORD uses the S-2 SITEMP and enemy capability estimate to plot the enemy engineer<br />
effort (obstacle or survivability effort) and its probable location. Coordinating with the S-2, the<br />
ENCOORD recommends IR that confirms or denies enemy engineer capability in the SITEMP. A<br />
summary of the enemy mission and M/CM/S capabilities are as follows:<br />
� Anticipate enemy engineer operations and their impact on the battle.<br />
� Assess threat patterns and capabilities in an asymmetric environment.<br />
� Consider enemy mission and doctrinal-employment of engineers.<br />
� Estimate enemy engineer capabilities based on the—<br />
� S-2 order of battle.<br />
� Threat engineer organizations.<br />
� Personnel and equipment capabilities.<br />
� Recent activity or newly developed TTP.<br />
F-13. Based on the S-2 SITEMP, enemy patterns, and enemy engineer doctrine (TTP), the ENCOORD<br />
plots enemy—<br />
� Mobility assets and their relative location within enemy formations.<br />
� Mine capability (tactical and protective obstacle effort), mine systems, and firing ranges of<br />
artillery-delivered SCATMINEs.<br />
� Engineer reconnaissance assets based on doctrine organization within enemy maneuver units.<br />
� HVTs (bridging assets, breaching assets, SCATMINE delivery systems).<br />
ANALYZE THE ENGINEER MISSION<br />
F-14. Analyze the engineer mission by—<br />
� Identifying specified and implied M/CM/S and general engineering tasks.<br />
� Analyzing friendly mission and M/CM/S capabilities.<br />
� Determining constraints.<br />
� Determining risk, as applied to engineer capabilities.<br />
� Conducting time analysis.<br />
� Developing essential tasks for M/CM/S.<br />
IDENTIFY SPECIFIED AND IMPLIED TASKS<br />
F-15. The ENCOORD identifies specified and implied tasks for M/CM/S, which ultimately results in the<br />
development of essential tasks for M/CM/S (discussed previously in chapter 2).<br />
F-16. Specified tasks are specifically assigned to a unit by higher headquarters. They may be found in the<br />
base order, annexes (ISR annex), and overlays. For engineers, this could include—<br />
� Obstacle zones.<br />
� Obstacle belts with intents.<br />
� Required number of breach lanes.<br />
� Type of breach designated by the higher commander.<br />
F-17. Implied tasks must be performed to accomplish a specified task or the mission, but are not stated in<br />
the higher-headquarters order. For engineers, this could include—<br />
� Obstacle handover coordination during a relief-in-place mission.<br />
� UXO removal or assistance with EOD removal.<br />
� Gap-crossing operation support if the crossing of a river is necessary to accomplish the mission.<br />
F-4 <strong>FM</strong> 3-<strong>34.22</strong> 11 February 2009