09.01.2013 Views

FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army

FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army

FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix F<br />

anticipated enemy mission (attack or defend) and consider how enemy engineers are doctrinally employed.<br />

The ENCOORD then develops an estimate of enemy engineer capabilities. To do this, the ENCOORD uses<br />

the S-2 order of battle and knowledge of enemy engineer forces and other assets (combat vehicle<br />

reconnaissance effort or self-entrenching capabilities) that may impact engineer operations. The<br />

ENCOORD must also consider intelligence pertaining to recent enemy engineer activity or TTP.<br />

F-12. The ENCOORD uses the S-2 SITEMP and enemy capability estimate to plot the enemy engineer<br />

effort (obstacle or survivability effort) and its probable location. Coordinating with the S-2, the<br />

ENCOORD recommends IR that confirms or denies enemy engineer capability in the SITEMP. A<br />

summary of the enemy mission and M/CM/S capabilities are as follows:<br />

� Anticipate enemy engineer operations and their impact on the battle.<br />

� Assess threat patterns and capabilities in an asymmetric environment.<br />

� Consider enemy mission and doctrinal-employment of engineers.<br />

� Estimate enemy engineer capabilities based on the—<br />

� S-2 order of battle.<br />

� Threat engineer organizations.<br />

� Personnel and equipment capabilities.<br />

� Recent activity or newly developed TTP.<br />

F-13. Based on the S-2 SITEMP, enemy patterns, and enemy engineer doctrine (TTP), the ENCOORD<br />

plots enemy—<br />

� Mobility assets and their relative location within enemy formations.<br />

� Mine capability (tactical and protective obstacle effort), mine systems, and firing ranges of<br />

artillery-delivered SCATMINEs.<br />

� Engineer reconnaissance assets based on doctrine organization within enemy maneuver units.<br />

� HVTs (bridging assets, breaching assets, SCATMINE delivery systems).<br />

ANALYZE THE ENGINEER MISSION<br />

F-14. Analyze the engineer mission by—<br />

� Identifying specified and implied M/CM/S and general engineering tasks.<br />

� Analyzing friendly mission and M/CM/S capabilities.<br />

� Determining constraints.<br />

� Determining risk, as applied to engineer capabilities.<br />

� Conducting time analysis.<br />

� Developing essential tasks for M/CM/S.<br />

IDENTIFY SPECIFIED AND IMPLIED TASKS<br />

F-15. The ENCOORD identifies specified and implied tasks for M/CM/S, which ultimately results in the<br />

development of essential tasks for M/CM/S (discussed previously in chapter 2).<br />

F-16. Specified tasks are specifically assigned to a unit by higher headquarters. They may be found in the<br />

base order, annexes (ISR annex), and overlays. For engineers, this could include—<br />

� Obstacle zones.<br />

� Obstacle belts with intents.<br />

� Required number of breach lanes.<br />

� Type of breach designated by the higher commander.<br />

F-17. Implied tasks must be performed to accomplish a specified task or the mission, but are not stated in<br />

the higher-headquarters order. For engineers, this could include—<br />

� Obstacle handover coordination during a relief-in-place mission.<br />

� UXO removal or assistance with EOD removal.<br />

� Gap-crossing operation support if the crossing of a river is necessary to accomplish the mission.<br />

F-4 <strong>FM</strong> 3-<strong>34.22</strong> 11 February 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!