09.01.2013 Views

FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army

FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army

FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix C<br />

Mass<br />

Table C-1. Breaching tenets (continued)<br />

Breaching Tenets Actions<br />

Synchronization<br />

INTELLIGENCE<br />

� Plan the point of breach where the enemy defense is the weakest.<br />

� Mass combat power to create enemy weakness at the point of breach.<br />

� Conduct detailed reverse planning.<br />

� Communicate clear subunit instructions.<br />

� Provide effective C2.<br />

� Perform combined arms rehearsals.<br />

C-8. During IPB, the situation template (SITEMP) is developed to graphically depict enemy expected<br />

disposition based on threat doctrine and the effects of the AO for a particular COA. The ENCOORD<br />

creates a template of enemy obstacles on the SITEMP based on enemy countermobility capabilities<br />

(manpower, equipment, materials, and time available), terrain, and the range of enemy weapon systems.<br />

Any unknowns about the enemy obstacle effort become IRs and are integrated into the ISR plan to<br />

generate OBSTINTEL. OBSTINTEL validates the template of obstacles and leads to refined maneuver and<br />

breach planning. Utilizing engineers in the reconnaissance effort can improve the specificity of the obstacle<br />

information being collected. Examples of obstacle-related IR include the—<br />

� Capability and location of enemy SCATMINE systems.<br />

� Location of existing and reinforcing obstacles.<br />

� Orientation and depth of obstacles.<br />

� Soil conditions (in the case of a minefield) to determine the ability to use tank plows.<br />

� Wire presence, location, and type.<br />

� Lane and bypass information.<br />

� Minefield composition (buried or surface-laid antitank [AT] or antipersonnel [AP] mines,<br />

antihandling devices [AHDs], and depth of mines).<br />

� Types of mines and fuses.<br />

� Composition of complex obstacles.<br />

� Areas between successive obstacle belts.<br />

FUNDAMENTALS<br />

C-9. The five breaching fundamentals (SOSRA) must be applied to ensure success when breaching<br />

against a defending enemy. These fundamentals always apply, but may vary based on mission variables in<br />

the AO.<br />

ORGANIZATION<br />

C-10. A commander organizes friendly forces to accomplish the breaching fundamentals quickly and<br />

effectively. Table C-2 shows the relationship between the breaching organization and breaching<br />

fundamentals. The commander organizes the following three forces to conduct breaching operations:<br />

� Support force.<br />

� Breach force.<br />

� Assault force.<br />

C-11. Planners use reverse planning to determine the forces and assets needed to conduct breaching<br />

operations and to ensure that actions on the objective are effectively resourced with the necessary<br />

breaching assets. Reverse planning starts with actions on the objective and works backward to the LD. The<br />

following apply to reverse planning:<br />

� The actions on the objective drive the size and composition of the assaulting force.<br />

� The size of the assaulting force determines the required number and location of lanes.<br />

C-4 <strong>FM</strong> 3-<strong>34.22</strong> 11 February 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!