FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army
FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army
FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Mobility<br />
� Possible enemy counterattack routes in support of the objective.<br />
� Critical infrastructure that needs protection.<br />
Engineer Support to Combat Operations<br />
6-66. Mobility is the main focus of engineer units during an infiltration, with priority of support to the<br />
main effort along the infiltration lane. Due to the decentralized nature of the maneuver, providing taskorganized<br />
engineer support to each infiltrating unit may not be feasible. Maneuver units must be trained<br />
and capable of executing the mobility operations anticipated on infiltration lanes. The requirement for<br />
dedicated support during the infiltration is minimized through the following:<br />
� Detailed predictive analysis by staff planners, represented on an enemy situational template<br />
(SITEMP).<br />
� Accurate and timely intelligence updates provided by engineers working with scouts during<br />
reconnaissance.<br />
� Detailed combined arms rehearsals.<br />
Actions on the Objective<br />
6-67. To provide adequate support to maneuver battalions and the RS during actions on the objective,<br />
detailed engineer planning at the brigade centers on war-gaming likely contingencies and transitions.<br />
Engineers may be task-organized to one or more maneuver battalions or the RS in a command relationship<br />
during the infiltration and for subsequent actions on the objective. This ensures the maneuver commander’s<br />
flexibility to further task-organize engineers and establish absolute control during breaching operations that<br />
follow actions on the objective. Subsequent, on-order missions (defense) may dictate a change in the task<br />
organization of engineer units. They may need to change from a command relationship to a support<br />
relationship with maneuver battalions or the RS. This is done to speed up the response of engineer units<br />
and ensure responsive sustainment support.<br />
Sustainment<br />
6-68. Infiltrations often require clearing extended MSRs from the LD to the attacking force. MSRs become<br />
particularly vital when the objective is secured and the attacking force requires support (Class V resupply,<br />
ground medical evacuation [MEDEVAC], barrier materials, engineer equipment, or situational-obstacle<br />
material) for a hasty defense. The infiltrating force bypasses obstacles and focuses on those enemy forces<br />
that may interdict high-speed AAs and MSRs. Therefore, the clearance of MSRs commonly resembles<br />
small-scale linkup operations and is planned and resourced accordingly. Breaching operations are common<br />
during MSR clearance. The BCT may need to rely on EAB engineer augmentation assets to provide the<br />
assets necessary to execute them.<br />
DEFENSIVE OPERATIONS<br />
6-69. Defensive operations are a prelude to the offense. Defense plans should not be designed simply to<br />
resist enemy attack. Rather, they should aim at reverting to the offense and decisively defeating the enemy.<br />
Defensive operations defeat an enemy attack, buy time, economize forces, or develop conditions favorable<br />
for offensive operations. Engineer focus is on attacking the enemy’s ability to influence operating areas<br />
(countermobility through combined arms obstacle integration) and on assuring mobility for friendly<br />
repositioning or counterattacking forces.<br />
6-70. Planning for defensive operations is inextricably linked to offensive operations, and for planning<br />
purposes, must consider the transition from offensive operations to follow-on offensive operations. Many<br />
planning considerations for the offense also apply to the defense. The engineer running estimate provides<br />
the framework for synchronizing and integrating engineer support into defensive operations. (See chapter 2<br />
for more planning considerations for defensive operations.)<br />
11 February 2009 <strong>FM</strong> 3-<strong>34.22</strong> 6-15