09.01.2013 Views

FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army

FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army

FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Engineer Support to Combat Operations<br />

hold an enemy in position, or facilitate other friendly operations. Offensive operations tend to highlight the<br />

assured mobility imperatives and attack the enemy’s ability to influence operating areas and maintain<br />

mobility and momentum. Engineer operations in support of offensive operations focus on enabling<br />

movement and maneuver.<br />

6-13. The engineer running estimate (discussed in chapter 2 and appendix F) provides the framework for<br />

the ENCOORD to synchronize and integrate engineer support into offensive operations. Conducting<br />

parallel planning is vital in allowing engineer units to position critical assets and to establish linkup and<br />

task-organize to their supported units. Early linkup with supported maneuver units provides critical time<br />

for combined arms planning and rehearsals. ENCOORDs at the appropriate echelon coordinate engineer<br />

reconnaissance to support the collection of necessary OBSTINTEL and other technical information. They<br />

also coordinate the movement and positioning of any required engineer augmentation assets (combat and<br />

general engineering). Although general engineering assets can be placed in command or support<br />

relationships with the maneuver force, task-organizing these assets directly to the combat engineering unit<br />

being augmented may be more effective. General engineering assets require added time for movement with<br />

their heavy and wheeled equipment. Though the focus of supporting offensive operations is on mobility,<br />

there may be requirements for protective positions for artillery systems, ADA systems, logistics positions,<br />

and stationary C2 facilities, especially during halts in the advance. During the early planning stages, terrain<br />

analysis teams can provide information on soil conditions, vegetative concealment, and terrain masking<br />

along march routes to facilitate survivability for the force. (More planning considerations for offensive<br />

operations are discussed in chapter 2.)<br />

CHARACTERISTICS<br />

6-14. Surprise, concentration, audacity, and tempo characterize successful offensive operations. Maneuver<br />

commanders sustain the initiative by committing their forces aggressively against enemy weaknesses.<br />

Attacks are force or terrain-oriented and facilitate the defeat of the enemy or the continuation of the attack.<br />

Maneuver commanders extend their attacks in time and space by engaging the enemy in depth and<br />

destroying key elements of the enemy force.<br />

Surprise<br />

6-15. Surprise denies the enemy the opportunity to focus and synchronize combat power against the<br />

attacking force. It prevents the enemy from massing forces or fires at a critical (possibly decisive) place<br />

and time. In place of cohesive resistance, surprise can produce confusion, fear, and piecemeal resistance.<br />

Factors that contribute to surprise include the tempo and intensity in executing the attack plan and<br />

employing unexpected factors (selecting a less than optimal COA), varying operational tactics and<br />

methods, conducting deception operations, and ensuring OPSEC. An enhanced COP and terrain<br />

visualization enable engineer commanders to achieve surprise because they better understand enemy<br />

defensive preparation. Engineers achieve surprise through obstacle reduction and the use of situational<br />

obstacles. They enable surprise by rapidly overcoming obstacles, thus increasing the force tempo.<br />

Concentration<br />

6-16. Concentration is the massing of overwhelming effects to achieve a single purpose. The massing of<br />

effects does not necessarily mean the physical massing of forces. With advancements in ground and air<br />

mobility, target acquisition, and long-range precision fires, the concentration of effects can occur more<br />

rapidly. The concentration of reduction assets and the negative influence from the presence of fortifications<br />

and obstacle effects directly impact the maneuver unit’s ability to concentrate the terminal effects of its<br />

fires. Concentration requires careful prior coordination within the combined arms team and with other<br />

Services and multinational partners as required. Engineers begin the concentration planning by integrating<br />

geospatial products and predicting threat obstacles. This effort is further enhanced with the employment of<br />

engineer reconnaissance which can provide the necessary OBSTINTEL and other technical information<br />

essential for detailed planning. This allows the maneuver force and the engineers that support them to<br />

concentrate reduction assets and overcome obstacles or other impediments at the POP as part of the<br />

maneuver unit breaching plan.<br />

11 February 2009 <strong>FM</strong> 3-<strong>34.22</strong> 6-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!