FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army
FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army
FM 3-34.22 - Army Electronic Publications & Forms - U.S. Army
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Analyze Friendly Mission and Capabilities<br />
Engineer Running Estimate<br />
F-18. The ENCOORD must understand the friendly mission, commander’s intent, and concept of the<br />
operation and understand how engineer capabilities contribute to the mission. To estimate the friendly<br />
mission and M/CM/S capabilities, the ENCOORD must—<br />
� Consider the friendly mission.<br />
� Evaluate friendly engineer capabilities and their impact on accomplishing the mission.<br />
� Estimate the available engineer assets based on the task organization of—<br />
� Maneuver forces.<br />
� Engineer forces.<br />
� Higher engineer headquarters.<br />
� Adjacent engineer units.<br />
� HN or contractor capabilities.<br />
� Consider the availability of critical resources.<br />
� Estimate the total engineer capability based on engineer planning.<br />
F-19. The ENCOORD considers all assets that can provide engineer capability, including task-organized<br />
engineer units, nonengineer unit assets have (mine plows), assets under the control of higher engineer<br />
headquarters (HN and contracted civilian support), and adjacent units. This understanding facilitates<br />
requests for additional resources based on shortfalls identified during mission analysis and COA<br />
development.<br />
F-20. Having determined the assets available, the ENCOORD works with the S-3 to determine the<br />
estimated time available. The ENCOORD can apply standard planning factors or known unit work rates to<br />
determine the total engineer capability. For example, in the offense, the ENCOORD focuses on the total<br />
amount of breaching equipment (MICLICs, AVLBs, engineer platoons, and any engineer augmentation)<br />
and translates that into the number of breach lanes. In the defense, the ENCOOD determines the number of<br />
minefields (or linear effort in kilometers), hull or turret defilade positions, and tank ditches that engineers<br />
could construct with available resources. In stability operations, the focus may be on the number of<br />
clearing teams that can be created. The ENCOORD uses these capability estimates during COA<br />
development.<br />
F-21. The ENCOORD combines the analysis of terrain and weather, and the analysis of the enemy and<br />
friendly mission, and M/CM/S capabilities to form facts and assumptions about the—<br />
� Likely enemy engineer effort.<br />
� Most probable enemy COA.<br />
� Potential enemy vulnerabilities.<br />
� Critical friendly requirements.<br />
� Impact of the preceding factors on the mission.<br />
Determine Constraints<br />
F-22. Constraints are restrictions placed on a unit by higher headquarters. They dictate an action or<br />
inaction, thus restricting the freedom of action a subordinate commander has for planning. Constraints can<br />
take the form of a requirement to do something. For engineers, this could include designated reserve<br />
targets, obstacle belts (with intents), and lane requirements. Constraints can also prohibit action, such as<br />
stated approval authority for use of SCATMINEs. Obstacle zones and belts are also examples of<br />
constraints because they limit the area in which tactical obstacles can be placed.<br />
Determine Risk<br />
F-23. Risk (tactical and accidental) consideration begins during planning, as commanders designate and<br />
weigh the decisive operation. To do this, they accept risk elsewhere to mass the combat power needed to<br />
accomplish the mission. A commander may specify an acceptable risk to accomplish the mission. For<br />
11 February 2009 <strong>FM</strong> 3-<strong>34.22</strong> F-5