09.01.2013 Views

A System of Heraldry - Clan Strachan Society

A System of Heraldry - Clan Strachan Society

A System of Heraldry - Clan Strachan Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3 -, OF<br />

THE PARTITION AND REPARTITION LINES<br />

When there are two perpendicular,<br />

or palar lines, dividing the shield or field into<br />

three equal parts, without cutting the centre, as fig. 15. it is blazoned, tierce in<br />

pale, azure, or, and gules ; and by the Latins, area in<br />

tripartite aquales trientes a<br />

summo (Hi irrium ex cyano, auro, fc? astro, so given us for the arms <strong>of</strong> Douchat in<br />

France, by Sylvester Petra Sancta.<br />

Tierce in fesse is such another, made by two horizontal lines, dividing the field<br />

into three equal parts,<br />

as fig.<br />

16. tierce in fesse, azure, sable, and argent; the<br />

French say sometimes, d''azure coupe, de sable et tierce $ argent. Sylvester Petra<br />

Sancta blazons such a coat, belonging to the Berengi in Hessia, area tripartita<br />

transversa in tres trientes ex veneto furvo IS argenteo. There are other two tierces, after the position <strong>of</strong> the bend, dexter, and sinister,<br />

by dividing the field into three equal parts by two diagonal lines ; the first, as fig.<br />

17. tierce in bend, or, gules, and azure, by the name <strong>of</strong> Noinpar in France. The<br />

other from the left to the right,<br />

as fig. 18. tierce in bend, sinister, or, sable, and<br />

argent, by Turlinger in Bavaria. The French say, instead <strong>of</strong> tierce in bend, sinister,<br />

tierce en bar.<br />

These partitions, by tiercing the field, are not used in Britain in forming a sim-<br />

ple coat <strong>of</strong> arms, but only when they marshall three coats <strong>of</strong> arms in one shield,<br />

<strong>of</strong> which afterwards. The Germans, French, and other nations, have, besides these<br />

tierces, which make up one coat <strong>of</strong> arms, others <strong>of</strong> the same nature, which do not<br />

occur in our British Blazons, at least if they do, they are not under the terms used<br />

abroad, <strong>of</strong> which I shall give a few instances for my reader's satisfaction.<br />

the name <strong>of</strong><br />

Fig. 19. This is called tierce in mantle, azure, argent, and gules, by<br />

Absperg in Ratisbon, which is made when the field is divided into three parts, by<br />

two lines issuing from the middle <strong>of</strong> the upper part <strong>of</strong> the shield, and dividing it-<br />

self again at the collar point into two diagonal lines, somewhat circular to the<br />

flanks. Which partition is frequent in the arms <strong>of</strong> religious orders, to represent<br />

their different habits ;<br />

the undermost area represents the tunic or vest, and the up-<br />

per part the surcoat or pallium, and in what colours they are worn. Sylvester Petra<br />

Sancta, speaking <strong>of</strong> this partition, Cap. XXIV. says, " Ad haec scutaria chla-<br />

" mvs seu trabea, ter perinde scuti aream partitur ; & quod explicatur utrinque,<br />

" hoc refert pallium, quodque intus apparet, tunicam seu internum amiculum re-<br />

" presentat, ut dubitari non possit, quin ad similitudinem vestium, imo ad rem<br />

" vestiariam haec symboli gentilitii forma pertinet, idque ordinum religiosorum etiam<br />

"<br />

tessenc conformant, exemplo sint trabea aut coccinea, supra tunicam intextam<br />

"<br />

argento; quoe est Ghisiorum Venetiis ac Plessenbergionum in Franconia." And,<br />

on the margin, our author tells us, the French would call it<br />

pile<br />

or chappe ; and<br />

gives us several examples <strong>of</strong> this nature, some <strong>of</strong> which are reversed, to whom I refer<br />

the curious. I have observed, that the Spaniards marshall their arms by this<br />

partition, tierce in mantle ; as the family <strong>of</strong> Henriquez, first and second, argent,<br />

charged with a lion rampant, gules ; and the third <strong>of</strong> the last with a castle, or; being<br />

descended <strong>of</strong> a natural son <strong>of</strong> Ferdinand King <strong>of</strong> Leon and Castile.<br />

There is another partition more frequent, parted per pile in point, or and sable,<br />

fig. 20. so blazoned by Guillim and other English heralds. Gerard Leigh says, the<br />

pile part <strong>of</strong> this coat may be charged, and no other part there<strong>of</strong>; and that it may<br />

be used as one only coat ; but by what authority he asserts the field cannot be<br />

oharged, I know not, for the practice <strong>of</strong> is England otherwise : As in the arms <strong>of</strong><br />

SEYMOUR. Duke <strong>of</strong> Somerset, and <strong>of</strong> PARRE Marquis <strong>of</strong> Northampton. I do not<br />

take this figure to be a proper partition, but rather a field sable , charged with a<br />

pile or, one <strong>of</strong> the subordinaries, <strong>of</strong> which afterwards.<br />

Tierce in pile from the left to the right, gules, argent, and or ; the French say,<br />

tierce embarasse d droit de gueules d' argent et d'or, for the family <strong>of</strong> NEGENDUCK, as<br />

Menestrier in his La Science de la Noblesse.<br />

Tierce in giron, bend sinister ways, sable, argent, and. gules : But Menestrier<br />

ys, tierce en girons en barre,<br />

mily <strong>of</strong> Wa's.<br />

de sable, d? argent, et de gueules, fig. 22. for the fa-<br />

Tierce in girons arrondi ; Menestrier says, tierce en girons gironnans au arrondis<br />

de gueules, d' argent, et de sable, carried by De Mengentzer, as in his La Science de<br />

la Noblesse, 011 la Nouvelle Metbode du Blason, fig. 23.<br />

Tierce in pairle, is frequent with the French and Germans, Its form and name-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!