10.01.2013 Views

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>the</strong> spirit <strong>of</strong> connection S 137<br />

consolations <strong>of</strong> religion, we can make no persuasive case for sustainability<br />

beyond <strong>the</strong> fact that we wish <strong>to</strong> survive. In o<strong>the</strong>r words,<br />

environmentalists lack both a deep explanation for what ails us<br />

and a larger cosmology or spirituality rendered in<strong>to</strong> a coherent<br />

and plausible alternative s<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> our ecological maladjustments.<br />

Neuroscientists and biologists are learning a great deal about<br />

what makes us tick, but can <strong>the</strong>y tell a compelling, au<strong>the</strong>ntic, and<br />

life-oriented s<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> our human sojourn plausible and powerful<br />

enough <strong>to</strong> replace s<strong>to</strong>ries about <strong>the</strong> end times and <strong>the</strong> inevitability<br />

<strong>of</strong> Armageddon? If <strong>the</strong>y cannot, charlatans will fi ll <strong>the</strong> human<br />

need for meaning in hard times with snake oil <strong>of</strong> one kind or<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

I do not presume <strong>to</strong> know what <strong>the</strong> s<strong>to</strong>ry might be, but I think<br />

it must begin by placing science in a larger context where fact<br />

and mystery meet. There are many good examples <strong>of</strong> scientists<br />

who have been true <strong>to</strong> both science and its larger context,<br />

such as E. O. Wilson on biological diversity, <strong>David</strong> Ehrenfeld on<br />

humans in nature, Carl Safi na on <strong>the</strong> oceans, Rachel Carson on<br />

<strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> wonder, Thomas Berry and Brian Swimme on “<strong>the</strong><br />

universe s<strong>to</strong>ry,” and Stuart Kauffman on reinventing <strong>the</strong> sacred.<br />

But within <strong>the</strong> scientifi c drama <strong>of</strong> life, evolution, and cosmos,<br />

who and what are we, and why do we, <strong>of</strong> all creatures, deserve <strong>to</strong><br />

be sustained? Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> debate about sustainability begins with<br />

<strong>the</strong> unstated assumption that since we want <strong>to</strong> survive, we ought <strong>to</strong><br />

survive, making <strong>the</strong> question moot. But we should not let ourselves<br />

<strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> hook so easily. The reason I <strong>of</strong>fer is entirely practical: if we<br />

could know why we ought <strong>to</strong> be sustained, we might better understand<br />

how <strong>to</strong> go about it. To know ourselves worthy <strong>of</strong> survival, for<br />

one thing, would lend energy <strong>to</strong> our efforts <strong>to</strong>ward sustainability. If<br />

we believe ourselves unworthy—no more than maximizing creatures<br />

Homo economicus, or just clever primates—our efforts <strong>to</strong>ward<br />

sustainability will lack <strong>the</strong> conviction that arises from knowing our<br />

cause <strong>to</strong> be valid. And knowing what makes us worthy <strong>of</strong> longevity<br />

will help us set priorities in <strong>the</strong> years ahead and determine those

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!