Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>the</strong> spirit <strong>of</strong> connection S 137<br />
consolations <strong>of</strong> religion, we can make no persuasive case for sustainability<br />
beyond <strong>the</strong> fact that we wish <strong>to</strong> survive. In o<strong>the</strong>r words,<br />
environmentalists lack both a deep explanation for what ails us<br />
and a larger cosmology or spirituality rendered in<strong>to</strong> a coherent<br />
and plausible alternative s<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> our ecological maladjustments.<br />
Neuroscientists and biologists are learning a great deal about<br />
what makes us tick, but can <strong>the</strong>y tell a compelling, au<strong>the</strong>ntic, and<br />
life-oriented s<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> our human sojourn plausible and powerful<br />
enough <strong>to</strong> replace s<strong>to</strong>ries about <strong>the</strong> end times and <strong>the</strong> inevitability<br />
<strong>of</strong> Armageddon? If <strong>the</strong>y cannot, charlatans will fi ll <strong>the</strong> human<br />
need for meaning in hard times with snake oil <strong>of</strong> one kind or<br />
ano<strong>the</strong>r.<br />
I do not presume <strong>to</strong> know what <strong>the</strong> s<strong>to</strong>ry might be, but I think<br />
it must begin by placing science in a larger context where fact<br />
and mystery meet. There are many good examples <strong>of</strong> scientists<br />
who have been true <strong>to</strong> both science and its larger context,<br />
such as E. O. Wilson on biological diversity, <strong>David</strong> Ehrenfeld on<br />
humans in nature, Carl Safi na on <strong>the</strong> oceans, Rachel Carson on<br />
<strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> wonder, Thomas Berry and Brian Swimme on “<strong>the</strong><br />
universe s<strong>to</strong>ry,” and Stuart Kauffman on reinventing <strong>the</strong> sacred.<br />
But within <strong>the</strong> scientifi c drama <strong>of</strong> life, evolution, and cosmos,<br />
who and what are we, and why do we, <strong>of</strong> all creatures, deserve <strong>to</strong><br />
be sustained? Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> debate about sustainability begins with<br />
<strong>the</strong> unstated assumption that since we want <strong>to</strong> survive, we ought <strong>to</strong><br />
survive, making <strong>the</strong> question moot. But we should not let ourselves<br />
<strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> hook so easily. The reason I <strong>of</strong>fer is entirely practical: if we<br />
could know why we ought <strong>to</strong> be sustained, we might better understand<br />
how <strong>to</strong> go about it. To know ourselves worthy <strong>of</strong> survival, for<br />
one thing, would lend energy <strong>to</strong> our efforts <strong>to</strong>ward sustainability. If<br />
we believe ourselves unworthy—no more than maximizing creatures<br />
Homo economicus, or just clever primates—our efforts <strong>to</strong>ward<br />
sustainability will lack <strong>the</strong> conviction that arises from knowing our<br />
cause <strong>to</strong> be valid. And knowing what makes us worthy <strong>of</strong> longevity<br />
will help us set priorities in <strong>the</strong> years ahead and determine those