Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
governance S 37<br />
chairman <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.K. Sustainable Development Commission,<br />
puts it this way:<br />
it is clearly politicians who have <strong>to</strong> make <strong>the</strong> most decisive interventions<br />
. . . it’s governments that frame <strong>the</strong> legal and constitutional<br />
boundaries within which individual citizens and corporate entities<br />
must operate; it’s governments that set <strong>the</strong> macro- economic<br />
framework through <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> fi scal and economic instruments;<br />
and it’s governments (by and large) that set <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>ne for public<br />
debate and that can take <strong>the</strong> lead on controversial and potentially<br />
divisive issues.” 30<br />
In o<strong>the</strong>r words, “<strong>the</strong> current approach <strong>to</strong> corporate responsibility<br />
simply isn’t up <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> task in hand. . . . <strong>the</strong> primary responsibility for<br />
making it all happen still lies with government” (p. 220).<br />
To work effectively, in o<strong>the</strong>r words, markets have always<br />
required energetic, fl exible, and imaginative governments <strong>to</strong> set<br />
<strong>the</strong> rules, level <strong>the</strong> playing fi eld, enforce <strong>the</strong> law, and protect<br />
<strong>the</strong> larger public good over <strong>the</strong> long term. That is only <strong>to</strong> say, as<br />
Yale political scientist Charles Lindblom argues, that “<strong>the</strong> market<br />
system can be unders<strong>to</strong>od only as a great and all-pervasive part<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> structure and life <strong>of</strong> society,” not <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r way around<br />
(Lindblom, 2001, p. 277). Or, as Amory Lovins puts it, “markets<br />
are only <strong>to</strong>ols. They make a good servant but a bad master and<br />
a worse religion . . . That <strong>the</strong>ology [economic fundamentalism]<br />
treats living things as dead, nature as a nuisance, several billion<br />
years’ design experience as casually discardable, and <strong>the</strong> future as<br />
worthless” (Hawken, Lovins, Lovins, 1999, p. 261).<br />
Corporations can do a great many things better than <strong>the</strong>y<br />
have, and markets can be harnessed <strong>to</strong> better purposes than<br />
<strong>the</strong>y have served in <strong>the</strong> past. Some major corporations such as<br />
Wal-Mart are greening <strong>the</strong>ir operations and supply chains. O<strong>the</strong>rs<br />
have joined <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> U.S. Climate Action Partnership <strong>to</strong><br />
support <strong>climate</strong> legislation. Some survivors in <strong>the</strong> fi nancial management<br />
community are developing instruments and investment