Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
governance S 29<br />
• Costs <strong>to</strong> human health,<br />
• Costs <strong>of</strong> all federal, state, and local subsidies, including levies<br />
not collected,<br />
• Costs <strong>of</strong> insurance against potentially catastrophic failure, and<br />
• Social impacts, especially <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> poor.<br />
It makes no sense whatsoever <strong>to</strong> choose policies that switch from<br />
potentially catastrophic problems <strong>to</strong> those that are merely ruinous.<br />
Proposals for “clean coal,” for example, ought <strong>to</strong> be evaluated<br />
against all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> mining on land, water, and people,<br />
as well as <strong>the</strong> costs and uncertainties <strong>of</strong> sequestering carbon in<br />
perpetuity at a cost that competes fairly with all o<strong>the</strong>r alternatives.<br />
20 Similarly, consideration <strong>of</strong> nuclear power must include <strong>the</strong><br />
subsidies for fuel enrichment and <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> insurance against<br />
accidents, decommissioning power plants, and s<strong>to</strong>rage <strong>of</strong> highlevel<br />
wastes in perpetuity, as well as <strong>the</strong> civil liberty implications<br />
<strong>of</strong> securing <strong>the</strong> nuclear fuel cycle and guarding its waste products<br />
for thousands <strong>of</strong> years, <strong>the</strong> effects on weapons proliferation,<br />
and an analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> catastrophic failure on a Chernobyl<br />
scale, whe<strong>the</strong>r by acts <strong>of</strong> God, human error, or malice. 21 In short,<br />
compared <strong>to</strong> every o<strong>the</strong>r choice nuclear power is slow, expensive,<br />
dangerous, incompatible with democracy, and uncompetitive<br />
with benign, cheaper, and more agile alternatives. All energy<br />
choices, however, must be measured against <strong>the</strong> potential for radically<br />
increased effi ciency at <strong>the</strong> point <strong>of</strong> end use, distributed solar<br />
technologies, and better design <strong>of</strong> communities, neighborhoods,<br />
and public transport that would eliminate <strong>the</strong> need for a large<br />
fraction <strong>of</strong> current fossil energy use.<br />
Second, under <strong>the</strong> multiple stresses described above, it is likely<br />
that economic contraction, not expansion, will become <strong>the</strong> norm.<br />
If so, many things that we associate with economic growth will<br />
be at risk. Harvard economist Benjamin Friedman, for one, argues<br />
that broad-based economic growth is directly related <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> moral<br />
advancement <strong>of</strong> society, by which he means greater opportunity,