Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
hope at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> our te<strong>the</strong>r S 187<br />
brought on in no small way by <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>l igate American way <strong>of</strong><br />
life, few are willing <strong>to</strong> say o<strong>the</strong>rwise. So we are <strong>to</strong>ld <strong>to</strong> buy hybrid<br />
cars, but not asked <strong>to</strong> walk, bike, or make fewer trips, even at <strong>the</strong><br />
end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> era <strong>of</strong> cheap oil. We are asked <strong>to</strong> buy compact fl uorescent<br />
light bulbs, but not <strong>to</strong> turn <strong>of</strong>f our electronic stuff or avoid<br />
buying it in <strong>the</strong> fi rst place. We are admonished <strong>to</strong> buy green, but<br />
seldom asked <strong>to</strong> buy less or repair what we already have or just do<br />
without. We are encouraged <strong>to</strong> build LEED-rated buildings that<br />
are used for maybe ten hours a day for fi ve days a week, but we<br />
are not asked <strong>to</strong> repair existing buildings or <strong>to</strong>ld that we cannot<br />
build our way out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mess we’ve made. We are not <strong>to</strong>ld that<br />
<strong>the</strong> consumer way <strong>of</strong> life will have <strong>to</strong> be rethought and redesigned<br />
<strong>to</strong> exist within <strong>the</strong> limits <strong>of</strong> natural systems. And so we continue<br />
<strong>to</strong> walk north on that southbound train.<br />
And maybe, <strong>to</strong>ld that our hindquarters are caught in a wringer,<br />
<strong>the</strong> public would panic or, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, become so despairing<br />
as <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>p us from doing what we o<strong>the</strong>rwise would do that<br />
could save ourselves from <strong>the</strong> worst outcomes possible. This is<br />
an old and cynical view <strong>of</strong> human nature that assumes that public<br />
order and prosperity requires manipulating people in<strong>to</strong> being<br />
dependent and dependable consumers. People who do for <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />
make indifferent consumers and are a hazard <strong>to</strong> both <strong>the</strong><br />
economy and social stability. This is <strong>the</strong> kind <strong>of</strong> reasoning behind<br />
<strong>the</strong> philosophy <strong>of</strong> Leo Strauss and his secretive followers, who<br />
believe that elites have superior knowledge that <strong>the</strong> bovine masses<br />
could never comprehend. Access <strong>to</strong> such hidden knowledge<br />
licenses its possessors <strong>to</strong> manipulate <strong>the</strong> public and tell noble lies<br />
<strong>to</strong> achieve higher ends. 1<br />
Maybe this is true, and maybe gradualism is <strong>the</strong> right strategy.<br />
Perhaps <strong>the</strong> crisis <strong>of</strong> <strong>climate</strong> and those <strong>of</strong> equity, security, and<br />
economic sustainability will yield <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> cumulative effects <strong>of</strong><br />
many small changes without any sacrifi ce at all. Maybe changes<br />
now under way are enough <strong>to</strong> save us. Maybe small changes will<br />
increase <strong>the</strong> willingness <strong>to</strong> make larger changes in <strong>the</strong> future.