14.01.2013 Views

Global Burden of Armed Violence - The Geneva Declaration on ...

Global Burden of Armed Violence - The Geneva Declaration on ...

Global Burden of Armed Violence - The Geneva Declaration on ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62<br />

GLOBAL BURDEN <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ARMED VIOLENCE<br />

Box 3.6 <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> mobilizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> inequalities<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> vast majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> multiethnic and multi-religious societies are<br />

not excessively violent (Fear<strong>on</strong> and Laitin, 1996). Nevertheless,<br />

policy-makers would do well to better understand the circumstances<br />

under which violent ethnic and communal c<strong>on</strong>flicts do break out.<br />

A recent project by the Centre for Research <strong>on</strong> Inequality, Human<br />

Security and Ethnicity (CRISE) at Oxford University focuses <strong>on</strong> the<br />

role <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ‘horiz<strong>on</strong>tal inequalities’ as a causal factor. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> study focuses<br />

<strong>on</strong> Latin America, South-east Asia, and West Africa, and finds that<br />

leaders are instrumental in mobilizing latent horiz<strong>on</strong>tal inequalities<br />

into c<strong>on</strong>flicts and occasi<strong>on</strong>ally armed violence. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>y play a<br />

critical role in fomenting social cleavages al<strong>on</strong>g particular group<br />

identities and in exacerbating tensi<strong>on</strong>s between communities for<br />

instrumental gain.<br />

Horiz<strong>on</strong>tal inequalities refer to the ec<strong>on</strong>omic, social, and political<br />

inequalities between culturally defined groups (Stewart, 2008). 13<br />

Most people have multiple social identities, including gender,<br />

ethnicity, religi<strong>on</strong>, language, pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>, and geographic locati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> importance attached to some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these identities varies. In some<br />

c<strong>on</strong>texts where <strong>on</strong>e’s group affiliati<strong>on</strong> assumes more prominence,<br />

however, they can lead individuals to fight, kill, and die in the<br />

name <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> identity (Stewart, 2008). This is particularly likely to be<br />

the case where groups have suffered vis-à-vis other groups in<br />

terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> their ec<strong>on</strong>omic advancement, educati<strong>on</strong>al and social<br />

welfare, access to the state in terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> exercising political voice<br />

or using services, or rights to express their cultural identity (Langer<br />

and Brown, 2008; Diprose and Ukiwo, 2008; Stewart, 2008). Group<br />

identities and the real and perceived relati<strong>on</strong>ships between groups,<br />

are frequently a central feature <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>temporary armed violence.<br />

In Côte d’Ivoire, for example, differences in socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic status<br />

between northerners and southerners were mobilized by political<br />

leaders and the media (Langer, 2008). Likewise, in both Nigeria<br />

and Ind<strong>on</strong>esia localized identity differences were critical in mobilizing<br />

votes and gaining access to local government instituti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

(Diprose and Ukiwo, 2008). Group affiliati<strong>on</strong>s can be mobilized<br />

according to religious affiliati<strong>on</strong> (e.g. Northern Ireland, India, and<br />

the Philippines), ethnicity (e.g. Rwanda and Sri Lanka), class and<br />

caste (e.g. Nepal), or some combinati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these. Ultimately,<br />

however, large-scale group mobilizati<strong>on</strong> is not likely to occur in<br />

the absence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> serious grievances experienced by both elites and<br />

citizens. 14<br />

Both leaders and followers may become str<strong>on</strong>gly motivated where<br />

there are severe and persistent ec<strong>on</strong>omic, social, and political<br />

differences between culturally defined groups. Østby (2008) also<br />

shows a significant rise in the probability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <strong>on</strong>set <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>flict<br />

across countries with severe social and ec<strong>on</strong>omic horiz<strong>on</strong>tal<br />

inequalities, for 1986–2004. Mancini (2008) also finds that horiz<strong>on</strong>tal<br />

inequality in child mortality rates and its change over time<br />

are positively (and significantly) associated with the patterns <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

ethno-communal violence in Ind<strong>on</strong>esia.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are also c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong>s between different types <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> horiz<strong>on</strong>tal<br />

inequality. Inequalities in political power <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten lead to social and<br />

ec<strong>on</strong>omic inequalities. Lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> access to educati<strong>on</strong> leads to decreased<br />

ec<strong>on</strong>omic opportunities, while low incomes tend to result<br />

in poor educati<strong>on</strong>al access and achievement in a vicious cycle <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

deprivati<strong>on</strong>. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are also reinforcing cycles <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> privilege and<br />

deprivati<strong>on</strong> because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the way that <strong>on</strong>e type <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital requires<br />

others to be productive (Stewart, Brown, and Langer, 2008).<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> nature <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the state and its reacti<strong>on</strong> to c<strong>on</strong>flicts are important<br />

elements determining the severity and persistence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>flict<br />

over time. In Guatemala’s civil war (1960–96) the extremely violent<br />

and repressive state reacti<strong>on</strong> to rebelli<strong>on</strong> has been described<br />

as ‘a campaign <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> state terror’ (Caumartin, 2005, p. 22) with massive<br />

killings, particularly focused <strong>on</strong> the indigenous populati<strong>on</strong>. In<br />

areas where the state is absent (whether by design or by default),<br />

local instituti<strong>on</strong>s and local leaders’ reacti<strong>on</strong>s to emerging c<strong>on</strong>flicts<br />

can determine the likelihood and persistence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> violence.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are ways to minimize the risk that such horiz<strong>on</strong>tal inequalities<br />

will be mobilized into violent c<strong>on</strong>flicts. For example, in both<br />

Nigeria and Ind<strong>on</strong>esia the presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> formal and informal instituti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

in peace-building can prevent armed violence from breaking<br />

out. Where the state gives equal treatment to competing sides<br />

(e.g. accountability and incentives to resolve tensi<strong>on</strong>s), suspici<strong>on</strong><br />

can be reduced and social capital fostered.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is also empirical evidence that power sharing (through state<br />

structures) can reduce political horiz<strong>on</strong>tal inequalities. Likewise,<br />

taxati<strong>on</strong>, affirmative acti<strong>on</strong>, employment and educati<strong>on</strong> quotas,<br />

and other factors are shown to have a significant impact <strong>on</strong> reducing<br />

socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic horiz<strong>on</strong>tal inequalities. Successful examples<br />

include Malaysia, where systematic policies introduced in the<br />

1970s have improved the positi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Bumiputera, and Northern<br />

Ireland, where effective employment and educati<strong>on</strong> policies (am<strong>on</strong>g<br />

others) have sharply narrowed the difference between Catholics<br />

and Protestants and are <strong>on</strong>e major factor behind the progress to<br />

peace (Stewart, Brown, and Langer, 2008).<br />

Source: Diprose and Steward (2008)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!